l0000p

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by l0000p 7y ago

   You're showing a curious case of projection. I'm not presenting any arguments in favor of Mr Watson's research, I'm pointing out that you are not basing your opinion on all available facts since you're arguing for c
2. 2.▲
   by l0000p 7y ago

   What is interesting here is that you disregard authority for results you disagree with and quotes authority for results you agree on. It sounds like your emotions are deciding which results you find 'correct'. This is the exact pr
3. 3.▲
   by l0000p 7y ago

   But you're just assuming that he is wrong based on your own presumptions without any actual knowledge about the subject. The question is who is most likely to be right, a nobel prize winning Ph.D. specialized in molecular biology, gene
4. 4.▲
   by l0000p 7y ago

   There is an xkcd for that: https://www.xkcd.com/435/
5. 5.▲
   by l0000p 7y ago

   Wavelength and hardware.
6. 6.▲
   by l0000p 7y ago

   Unfortunately, a statement like that, has just as much value as the conspiracy theory. Since 5G is a vastly different technology, the only thing we can say for certain is that we don't know the health risks at this point.