kyleplum

6 ms·

31.
by kyleplum 4y ago
It's something but honestly anything less than 100% is not great though. You can't easily go from living on 100k a year to 50k or less. It's still fulfilling the purpose of being an unfair deterrent from finding employment el
32.
by kyleplum 4y ago
To be fair, it's generally discouraged to speak ill about a previous workplace when interviewing/working at a new job as it may reflect more poorly on you as an individual than the company you are disparaging.
33.
by kyleplum 4y ago
Okay let's use a specific example: I decide that I don't want to trade with Country A because they are producing weapons that they plan on using to attack me with. Now let's say Country B is trading with Country A, and I thin
34.
by kyleplum 4y ago
> Not banning trade doesn't force the countries to trade, it just gives them the choice. And the choice made by the US is to not trade with Cuba or anyone who trades with Cuba - it's their right to make this choice.
35.
by kyleplum 4y ago
Would it not be a violation of Cuba's National Autonomy to force them to trade with partner's that they did not wish to trade with?
36.
by kyleplum 4y ago
If Cuba refused to trade with anyone who traded with the US, would you say that Cuba is violating the national autonomy of the US?
37.
by kyleplum 4y ago
> I think the libertarian perspective is that we shouldn't have protections that prevent people from making personal choices that result in harm to themselves, but only from harming others. There are a few ways that someone bankrup
38.
by kyleplum 4y ago
Refusing to trade with a country is not a violation of their national autonomy.
39.
by kyleplum 4y ago
"We can see that you are talking. Would you like others in the meeting to see you as well?"
40.
by kyleplum 5y ago
More like a public pyramid where the people with the most divisive opinions are pushed to the top and given the largest megaphones