Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kwamenum86
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
31.
▲
Dear Virgin America
(virgin.com)
1 points
by
kwamenum86
10y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
by
kwamenum86
10y ago
-
33.
▲
by
kwamenum86
12y ago
PS: On a sidenote, and as Torrent Freak has written about them, I must point that Time4Popcorn are pretending to be developing another version of Popcorn Time. The truth is that they are ripping some of our community work without crediting
34.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
I used to find these types of articles useful. But now I see them more as dogma. Great engineers don't struggle with things like JavaScript inheritance because they understand best practices and trade offs. So in general, I find it
35.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
Expert troll?
36.
▲
Cognitive Polyphasia
(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
|
0 comments
37.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
The day I left Hacker News and didn't look back. Sick and tired of this "community".
38.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
Actually an improvement
39.
▲
Metonymy
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
|
0 comments
40.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
This reads like satire especially toward the end
41.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
this smells like a js engine optimization. you wouldn't expect substantially different machine code to run for "Direct assignment" and "other". i wouldn't be surprised if the loop is being unrolled or something.
42.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
If this is their IP they should license the technology out to an established company. If this isn't their IP they're kind of screwed anyway.
43.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
Pathetic? Care to elaborate on that?
44.
▲
by
kwamenum86
13y ago
that's kind of the point...
45.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
I see some criticisms (that I agree with) of the "security" model here. Implementing the self destruction protection on the client is problematic (even in the case of SnapChat) because the end user is in control of the client. So if users
46.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Not CSRF. XSSI. It's actually completely different
47.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Actually this prevents XSSI (cross-site script inclusion) not XSRF (cross-site request forgery). XSRF vulnerabilities allow an attacker to issue web requests on a user's behalf; oftentimes though people only call it a vulnerability when you
48.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
"It is ironic since whenever I have met with our elected officials they are invariably thoughtful, well-meaning people." Maybe they come off as thoughtful and well-meaning because many of them are sociopaths. Indeed, politicians are much m
49.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
you probably run into that more with global functions, which this definitely isn't suitable for. but if you trickle a callback that just handles, for example, keydown on a single input, this sort of thing is really useful.
50.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
My favorite part is the tongue in cheek title for Tim Berner-Lee: "Web Developer". That's an understatement (as well as a perfectly accurate one).
51.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Don't use this. Mutation events are insanely expensive.
52.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Have to disagree. This has already been mentioned elsewhere but comments with little value are already penalized when people downvote them. If you notice more crap comments that aren't being downvoted that's because a) the community standar
53.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
You might find the fourth page of the code examples for the date function helpful. Shows several formatting examples.
54.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Why doesn't it surprise you?
55.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Smells like an acquisition in a year or so (and I mean that as a compliment). Congrats in advance.
56.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Like a 3 clawed hammer, there simply is no reason for this :) j/k It's really cool. And really impressive. And if you can make it perform well in the browser (big if I bet) I can think of several valid use cases. Nice work
57.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1.2+billion+%2F+msft+pr...
58.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
First of all, technically this is a CAPTCHA still. Second of all, you can eliminate the vast majority (or sometimes all) of your spam using honeypots much simpler CAPTCHAS like "what is four + 2?".
59.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
I don't think any of these suggestions make JSON easier to read, generate, or consume. What problem are you setting out to solve? Opening paragraph: "JSON is strict. Keys need to be quoted; strings can only be double-quoted; objects and ar
60.
▲
by
kwamenum86
14y ago
Wait...when you say fail are you saying they fail to produce something optimal or fail to produce working code?
More ›