Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kulahan
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
361.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
I’m saying that even if I blindly accept that it’s actually 30%, that’s not much. Calling it rare seems much more reasonable than calling it common.
362.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
Right, don't do that. Hire someone for it. It's not that much work in the grand scheme of running a business, and the return on investment is enormous. If you're not built to do this in support of your business, you're r
363.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
less than 30% isn't really something I'd call common
364.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
What makes you say that? It’s rare that a store I’m going to, even local only, doesn’t have a website.
365.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
Countless hours? Get someone to make you a webpage, they can use Wix or Shopify or something like this. It’s never been easier or cheaper. In the grand scheme of running a business, it’s one of the best effort:return ratios you can find.
366.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
Not really - every single Burger King out there sells the beyond burger as far as I've seen.
367.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
In the context of this discussion, who cares what's possible in foreign countries?
368.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
It’s not like if it fails, you’re forbidden from trying again, yeah? Or am I incorrect on this? Not European.
369.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
I don't disagree with this. I just think it's more likely people will continue finding ways to make life easier, rather than us collectively agreeing to like... stop at some point.
370.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
Please explain how to hire good engineers. This is a question literally only you have figured out, so your knowledge would be extremely useful here.
371.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
It's completely untrustworthy, so eventually we'll hit an inflection point where we discover that we either cannot use AI anywhere we need trust, or we'll put a human middleman in there. The latter sounds much more realistic.
372.
▲
by
kulahan
7mo ago
Who, specifically, is killing someone with a chatbot? What is the specific mechanism by which they kill someone? And “creating fake cycles”? What does that even mean?
373.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
It's no longer safe for children to be unsupervised on the internet.
374.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
I know you didn't propose those things - I'm saying they are going to be required in order to force the population to stay at an unreasonably low 1 billion people on Earth forever
375.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
If you think the US has an interest in either Iran OR Iraq being dominant in the region without, at BEST, being completely subservient to the US, you may want to review how you think this will turn out.
376.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
TIL, that’s awesome. Thanks very much
377.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
It's not really bad faith when we could make enormous progress in an enormous number of industries, and this in no way stops any of that progress in those economies. It's specifically bad faith to say it as if it does somehow
378.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
I'm very curious where you got the inspiration for the name for this! I've been using Kula/Kulahan as a username for years and almost never see it anywhere else
379.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
Most people don’t have the touch typing skill and do not care to learn it. It literally matters zero per cent if they would benefit from learning that.
380.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
Which leader do you think is more likely to get elected by the populace? The one who tells the destitute Indians they must suffer more, lest their home be lost, or the one who says it’s America’s fault, and that they should pay in MANY ways
381.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
A lot of things would be easier if 90% of people suddenly disappeared, but there is absolutely no sane scenario in which we actively chase such an unbelievably low population count. The birth rates are declining in large part because of the
382.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
Literally none of those things you wrote are inherently a crime. Granted, maybe that’s the problem, but no - it’s not illegal to get rich, or to use a lot of energy, or to make low quality products.
383.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
The fact that one in ten million people is annoyed by one of the softest lights ever invented by mankind is not a good reason to not include said feature in a product my guy.
384.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
Thank goodness they removed this fantastic thing everyone wants to give you an extra fourteen seconds of use time per battery charge. Come on man. As for the importance of it, if you want to give these to kids, you should have something mor
385.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
A keyboard backlight is such a cheap and useful addition to a keyboard, it feels insulting not to get it. I cannot believe this is one of the ways they decided to cheap out. I wouldn’t even care about the 8GB of ram if I could just add some
386.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
Doesn’t Apple use pretty damn quick NVME? I wonder how much of a performance drop it actually is. Certainly not as bad as running a swap file on a 5400 rpm HDD…
387.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
4chan once tricked a number of people into microwaving their iPhones by claiming it was a new feature for fast charging. This probably isn't too hard if you've got enough friends or fans in on the joke.
388.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
I'm asking because I genuinely am ignorant. Can't you just put all the tokens into a mixer, create a new account, send them to that account, and then you're completely invisible from there on out? Or even make a bunch of new
389.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
The result that it didn't affect any other cells really doesn't matter nearly as much when the other unaffected cells are literally from a completely different animal.
390.
▲
by
kulahan
8mo ago
This is why people begging to take untested, unknown drugs in the extreme off-chance of they work is generally a bad approach. It almost never works, and it encourages the earlier release of ineffective drugs to a wider audience.
More ›