Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kuhsaft
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
You are correct, it is not based on SQUID. But, I think SQUID is technically a class of quantum magnetometer? Quantum magnetometry is pretty vague, since most high-end magnetometers use some sort of quantum mechanics. I think the term you&#
62.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
Right, magnetoencephalography has been known for some time. The ending of that paper is wild though with the weird ESP paranormal stuff, then I remembered that this is a CIA paper from the 70s...
63.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
> AMBIIENT’s goal was biological imaging.. sensors near a body for medical/neuroscience applications. As with all DARPA projects, there is a civilian use-case and a military use-case. That demo was at a conference, in a city, surrou
64.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
Background noise is pretty random. A cardiac signal is pretty regular.
65.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
They require a shielded room to increase the SNR. SQUID sensors are sensitive enough to record cardiac signals at distance. The issue is SNR. What they are saying is that they produced a low noise sensor array and managed to increase the SN
66.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
So is cm resolution with satellite imagery, but the NRO does have those capabilities.
67.
▲
by
kuhsaft
6mo ago
Magnetocardiography is a thing. The NRO has some insane capabilities, so I wouldn’t immediately discredit the idea that a magnetocardiographic scan of a large area is possible. It’s important to note that the individual was isolated by mile
68.
▲
by
kuhsaft
11mo ago
> They aren't drinking because drinking is a social thing being social != drinking. likewise, drinking != being social You can still be social and not drink alcohol. You can drink alcohol and not be social. Pretty much every establi
69.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> https://x.com/XWineOne/status/1884670205701374063 > People make translation layers for the console APIs and then you can play whatever game as long as they've implemented the APIs it uses. It's c
70.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> People crack the console-exclusive versions of a game and then play them on a PC. Can you provide an example of a current Xbox One or PS5 exclusive that is available on PC? Why isn't Death Stranding 2, Ghost of Yotei, or Halo 5 av
71.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
I would add that end-users are OK with this because they expect their devices to not be compromised when installing an app. The majority of users are OK with trusted computing and are OK with trusting Google, Apple, Microsoft because it’s e
72.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
I wish I could edit my original post, but I meant to switch the causality around. What I’d meant was, a paid digital marketplace will end up with some form of DRM. And furthermore, economic incentives will drive devices to implement some fo
73.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> Xbox games are cracked all over the place. You're referring to jailbreaks. The incentive to jailbreak an Xbox is pretty low because if you did it, it would be basically a PC and anyone who wants "basically a PC" would ju
74.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
Being a web app doesn’t mean shit. We already have DRM encrypted web content where the consuming device requires some attestation to decode. I.e. Widevine.
75.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
For music and movies, yes. Though with movies, you even have HDMI HDCP and DisplayPort DPCP to make it harder. For games though, the game binary is the media. Game console developers have been very successful at preventing pirating.
76.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
Xbox, post-360, has been very successful at doing so.
77.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
Which is the same as root-of-trust attestation. Which is better: - Having applications provide kernel-level software to provide attestation. - Or having the OS provide root-of-trust attestation, but also requiring signed binaries, and preve
78.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> And yet the pirates still have all of their content, because DRM doesn't work. One pirate cracks one locked device and can download their entire catalog with it. I know and I'm saying what we are seeing is a push to plug all
79.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> For streamed content the pirates only need one person to crack one device Thus the push for locked devices. > What it's nominally supposed to be for is so that a server can verify that the device is approved before providing so
80.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> spared me of the headache of dealing with pirated things Without any sort of DRM and today's internet speeds, pirating digital media would probably be like Napster Greenheart Games famously purposely released a different version o
81.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
And Steam implements its own DRM and takes 30% from game publishers. Also, they don't stop game developers from providing their own DRM which require root-of-trust, like CoD or BF6 which require Secure Boot.
82.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> I can't help but think there might be some effect here that's locking us all in similar to how the U.S. healthcare system can't seem to shake for profit insurance. Yeah. It's called capitalism, where the reasoning b
83.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
I think it's more equivalent to when game consoles check the license on disc media. It used to be via hardware in the disc reader, then online license checking. And now it's fully digital, media and license. The fucked up part is
84.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
Steam is a bit different, since that originated as a PC digital marketplace before complete root-of-trust DRM from HW->bootloader->OS->SW. If anything, I would bet on a shift where Steam on Linux requires a signed OS like Windows S
85.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
It's less likely that game consoles and smartphones will become fully unlocked like personal computers. I would bet on the opposite where personal computers have the same HW/SW model as smartphones. We are already almost there wit
86.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
> It is interesting though how this same conversation doesn't exist in the same way in other areas of computing like video game consoles Historically, when the first game consoles with game cartridges existed, the hardware was much
87.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
There's still no proof that it was Trenchant, and there was no evidence on the device. It's unlikely that it will ever be identified as an attack from Trenchant. Trenchant/L3Harris is a supplier for Five Eyes, and any attribu
88.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
Right. I was talking about passenger safety. But sure, if you purposefully designed a vehicle that has poor pedestrian visibility and end up getting hit by that same vehicle due to that poor visibility, you shouldn't be surprised.
89.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
An engineer at Ford isn’t developing cars that actively harms passengers. If you develop weapons, physical or digital, don’t be surprised if you end up on the receiving end.
90.
▲
by
kuhsaft
1y ago
You shouldn't have to change the SDK. You can create a class library ASP.NET Core Server by using a FrameworkReference [1]. I can't remember the library, but there was one that had its own `IHostedService` with its own embedded AS
More ›