kuhsaft

10 ms·

91.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
The closest comparison to SharePoint is probably a combination of Zoho Connect, Zoho WorkDrive, and Zoho Flow. Zoho's office suite also integrates with WorkDrive and has collaborative editing. They even have a desktop app for Writer. E
92.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
The issue isn’t Windows vs Linux. It’s an application security exploit and it just so happens that it only runs on Windows. SharePoint Server is widely used and is a high value target. Atlassian Server products have had their fair share of
93.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
Canonical and Red Hat have certified hardware. Most corporate workers aren’t software developers. They just want their productivity suite for email, scheduling, messaging, documents, spreadsheets, and presentations.
94.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
It’s been pretty consistent with how macOS MDM works with device profiles. The software to manage provisioning of device profiles may have changed, but at the OS level it hasn’t.
95.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
> Perhaps it's not enough for there to be a "push" to Open Source because you've been failed by a proprietary solution, there needs to be a "pull". Absolutely. A company isn’t going to create a GitHub issue
96.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
Do these companies support Net 30/60/90 payment? Do they provide enterprise support? There’s a reason why corporations use HP and Dell machines. And there’s a reason why HP/Dell/etc don’t have Linux OSes on their corpora
97.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
> A comment about adding "Redhat" to the mix is not talking about desktops (necessarily) but servers and security. Why would you use RHEL to manage Windows client machines, when you could use Windows Server/Azure and get M
98.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
Most enterprise PCs are Windows machines and integrate with Microsoft services easily. The only way Microsoft is going to lose the enterprise market is if enterprise PCs move away from Windows. But, for enterprises, the only reasonable migr
99.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
CORRECTION: Chats are only journaled to Exchange mailboxes for data compliance. Messages are actually stored in Cosmos DB. https://youtu.be/V6B4KraD-FM?feature=shared&t=319 Contacts and voicemail are stored in Exchange.
100.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
Yeah. Once you start working with the SharePoint API and Exchange API, you realize how it’s a miracle that Teams works at all. It’s bonkers. I once figured out that you can go to the permissions page on the SharePoint site created by Teams
101.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
It’s not cybersecurity. It’s legal, trust me. For large corporations, eDiscovery is huge. Failing eDiscovery can cost a company millions. Having a bunch of different data sources makes it impossible, so companies stick with M365 as corporat
102.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
It’s impossible to stop using M365 while stopping usage of SharePoint (cloud or on-premises). See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44640219 Here’s just one example: Each M365 Teams Team creates an M365 Group which creat
103.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
> It's not much effort to just drag and drop a file into … OneDrive … See, there’s the problem. Once you touch anything M365, you’re using SharePoint. People see SharePoint as a document collaboration tool. But, in reality, it’s rea
104.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
> Sharepoint is a poor amalgamation of like 18 different things. You’ve got it backwards. Everything M365 is an amalgamation of Entra, SharePoint, and Exchange.
105.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
For collaborative documentation, there’s probably a bunch of alternatives. But SharePoint is the linchpin for Microsoft 365. Well technically SharePoint and Exchange. You can’t use any Microsoft 365 products without SharePoint. OneDrive us
106.
by kuhsaft 1y ago
I don’t think that was why the Noddy was used. At the time film and projection were available. They could have recorded film and projected onto a sensor for re-broadcast. The Noddy was used since it was a live broadcast and “allowed the ide
107.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
> Smartphones and the internet have given the layperson awesome technology literally in their hands. The quote is "awesome technological powers", which, I think, is different from having a technological device. There are the da
108.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
I think the point is a collapse of the existing system and consolidation of power. And, I think it'll only embolden other megalomaniacs.
109.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
Maybe when weapons were more limited in destruction. But, now the government has weaponry supremacy, and I don’t think you would want anybody to have access to artillery, fighter jets, etc.
110.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
> It's amazing how condescending some people on here are You literally started your comment with "Lol news to me", then you used your degree as if it made you more knowledgeable than anyone else here. Take a look in the mi
111.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
Oh yeah. I'm not saying otherwise. Someone replied "Clear glass blocks about 5% visible light". I guess "clear glass" is pretty subjective. At what level of attenuation would someone consider glass not clear? xD
112.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
> Fiber optics also uses _exceptionally_ clear glass. Clear in certain wavelengths. Depends on the composition of the glass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber#/media/File:Si_Z... Silica glass beh
113.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
Depends on the frequency of EM. Fiber optic communications use specific frequencies to minimize attenuation in cables. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber#Mechanisms_of_at... Same with communications over coax.
114.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
> Do tell because as far as I'm aware Maxwell's equations don't have an asterisk on them that say "doesn't work below 1 GHz". Did you really just pull out Maxwell's equations? EM interacts with matter i
115.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
It’s insane to think that an extension with the ability to snoop on all your requests is more privacy oriented than one that can’t. It’s insane to want extensions to snoop on all your requests in an attempt at more privacy.
116.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
The point is that it’s a different permission. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41812416 If you are really privacy conscientious, ad blocking extensions should be able to exist without any access to web requests now.
117.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
Separate permission for debugging only available for development essentially. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Web... Otherwise, you can’t really without more invasive permissions
118.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
It still exists, but now “ad blockers” can’t use the blocking API to record and forward metrics on hits. Ad blockers don’t even need the webRequest and webRequestBlocking permissions anymore. Now, if an ad blocker has webRequest permissions
119.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
That uses a different manifest permission. https://developer.chrome.com/blog/crx-scripting-api#breaking...
120.
by kuhsaft 2y ago
> Still a shit poor pathetic excuse to screw over the userscript/grease monkey users. Tampermonkey still works fine with MV3 > We cannot pander to imagined ever worsening users forever. The most popular software/hardware wil

More ›