kubiknubika

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kubiknubika 7mo ago

   True for humans. AI has the opposite issue — in 1-on-1 there's only one person to impress. Easy to just agree. Add more people and you cant make everyone happy. Thats the whole point
2. 2.▲
   by kubiknubika 7mo ago

   Sure, messy to implement. But maybe that messiness is the fix. Clean 1-on-1 is exactly why AI learns to flatter — one voice, one signal, no pushback. Group is harder to train but harder to game
3. 3.▲
   by kubiknubika 7mo ago

   The stupid+industrious problem gets worse in 1-on-1 setup. AI has no competing voice to push back against its own industriousness. Maybe the fix is putting it in a room with 30 people who disagree
4. 4.▲
   Ask HN: Why do we train AI on one-on-one dialogues instead of group dynamics?

   3 points by kubiknubika 7mo ago|5 comments