kube-system

7 ms·

91.
by kube-system 2mo ago
If you could stop doing that thing, it isn't an impossibility under lex non cogit ad impossibilia.
92.
by kube-system 2mo ago
> Our FOSS code is constitutionally protected free speech and I would defend on those grounds. You have precisely zero additional speech rights as a FOSS project than any other organization has. If "free speech" was a valid de
93.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Because the requirements being placed on social media sites are much more nuanced than simply allowing or blocking content... to implement this all in the OS or browser would require an exponentially more complicated API.
94.
by kube-system 2mo ago
It seems that it mostly bans behavior-based personalization that is opaque to the user. It seems to allow for several types of personalization where the user has agency.
95.
by kube-system 2mo ago
> Any choice of what content to display is an algorithm. Maybe they want a simple or easily explainable algorithm? That's a paraphrasing of what law says. The law is more clearly defined: > "Addictive feed" means a web
96.
by kube-system 2mo ago
The law: https://www.ilga.gov/documents/legislation/publicacts/104/10...
97.
by kube-system 2mo ago
"Open" in regards to software typically refers to a combination of public availability and shared legal rights to use the software. It almost never refers to hardware requirements. There's something to be said for making the
98.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Only at the top few cloud providers. Search "Unmetered VPS" and you can find $5 VPSes with no bandwidth bill
99.
by kube-system 2mo ago
If you have a static site, GitHub pages is free
100.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Yeah, I know a law is just words written down... but what you're suggesting is not even what a PBC even is... you're suggesting something so radically different that it would be silly: 1. Corporate charters and form of incorporati
101.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Most Americans are not exposed to many foreign news outlets unless they seek it out. But we have our own share of media doing the same. The bigger issue is that people tend to subscribe to echo-chamber opinion-news outlets.
102.
by kube-system 2mo ago
The case was about Craig and Jim's stockholder-rights plan which they put into place to protect the direction of the company after their death. They're still alive... so of course, the past 30 years don't have anything to do
103.
by kube-system 2mo ago
They did, they’re called benefit corporation laws, and here’s a map of the states that have passed them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_corporation#/media/Fil... I don’t think there’s some practical wa
104.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Yeah, I commute 45 minutes to mine. That’s entirely reasonable for my use case. If you’re not doing something like HFT, then being in the same metro area is fine for most purposes. I was responding to why you wouldn’t want one in a differe
105.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Absolutely zero noise from any datacenter comes from the fans or power supplies of the equipment inside of it. The equipment is inside of the building. Datacenter noise comes from the chiller units.
106.
by kube-system 2mo ago
That depends highly on the datacenter. While a huge hyperscaler might be noisy, many datacenters are quiet enough that people don’t even know they’re there. The one I host at, you can’t hear from the end of the parking lot. The coolers ar
107.
by kube-system 2mo ago
But if it’s a colo it’s unlikely to have many LLMs running there. The big AI datacenters are mostly purpose built.
108.
by kube-system 2mo ago
If it’s a colo… yes, it would be primarily local customers. Data centers are not just for consumer B2C services. There’s a lot of stuff that runs in data centers that are both more important and more sensitive to latency or connectivity th
109.
by kube-system 2mo ago
It’s not necessarily “super high” latency to connect to data centers at a distance. Whether or not it matters depends on the application, and for most consumer applications it isn’t a huge issue. For AI data centers it doesn’t really mat
110.
by kube-system 2mo ago
The public discourse for any sufficiently technical topic sounds misinformed to anyone who understands the topic well. However that doesn’t mean that people don’t have real grievances, even if misplaced.
111.
by kube-system 2mo ago
> what’s the argument for placing them in populated areas to begin with? Colos advertise their proximity to populated areas. It is desirable for physical access, latency, and connectivity.
112.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Fiduciary duty absolutely does go beyond accurate communication and fraud. Directors have a duty of care that goes beyond simply not engaging in criminal fraud. Sure, you don't have to be competent, successful, etc. It is completely
113.
by kube-system 2mo ago
A PBC is not a charity or a non-profit. PBCs are for-profit businesses with the goal of making money. In day-to-day business they're indistinguishable with other for-profit corporations, including fundraising and investment. The onl
114.
by kube-system 2mo ago
That sounds reasonable for a practical general regulatory standard. For a personal standard, it is reasonable that an individual purchaser may use their own risk profile as that standard... as many of the risks involved are not random but c
115.
by kube-system 2mo ago
We absolutely can and do mitigate these risks when getting into vehicles driven by strangers: professional drivers typically have higher standards for driving history, and people can physically observe whether a friend/etc is drunk&#x2
116.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Because driving risk is far from evenly distributed. If a self-driving car drives like an average human driver, for responsible drivers, this would mean incurring more risk by getting into one. A huge portion of the risk of human drivers i
117.
by kube-system 2mo ago
"FSD (Supervised)" is a marketing name... which they updated with the parenthetical almost certainly because of brewing legal issues with false advertising. It does not self-drive. https://www.tesla.com/support&#x
118.
by kube-system 2mo ago
but it may not be accepted or viewed as moral by others
119.
by kube-system 2mo ago
It falls into the formerly mentioned "strange" category for other reasons, along with many other cruel practices. "Scientific soundness" is far from the only benchmark for a good idea.
120.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Because, as I just said, it's unlikely to be deliverable.

More ›