kube-system

5 ms·

61.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Every single MacBook built in the past half-decade already has an LLM built into the latest version of their OS. But there's a significant difference in hardware required between running a 3B parameter model and a 700B-1T+ parameter mo
62.
by kube-system 2mo ago
A bad developer with any current frontier model will happily produce syntactically correct code that is unreadable, in a spaghetti architecture, and write an elaborate test suite that tests all of the wrong things.
63.
by kube-system 2mo ago
By far the vast majority of children did not have that experience in the past, nor do they today.
64.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Every law only applies inside of the jurisdiction where it applies. That's the nature of how political boundaries work, it has nothing to do with LLMs.
65.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Diet and exercise guidance is the standard of care for prescribing GLP1s. But prescribing diet and exercise alone has long had mixed results, because it does nothing to address appetite, and it is even quite common for exercise to increase
66.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Legally speaking "stealing" isn't even a crime. You might be thinking of a different word: theft. But to answer your question more directly, here's the most common example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&
67.
by kube-system 2mo ago
"Stealing" in the OP merely refers to the lack of intent in sharing the plaintext traces. This is the same use as "the baseball player stole third base". Nobody is depriving anyone of anything, nobody is committing a cr
68.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Maybe but I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially when the argument at face value is factually incorrect.
69.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Words can change meaning, but whether or not they actually do is a social function of how they are observably used. Words can also have multiple meanings concurrently. When it comes to the word "steal" in these discussions, people
70.
by kube-system 2mo ago
That's also... a different word.
71.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Stole the words right out of my mouth!
72.
by kube-system 2mo ago
I'm aware. The issue is that group, albeit small, is larger than it was.
73.
by kube-system 2mo ago
I'm blaming the current social media landscape, which amplifies ideas based on the engagement they create, which has an unintended consequence of amplifying exciting controversial falsehoods over long-held boring truths. We have given
74.
by kube-system 2mo ago
He was appointed and holds those views because these ideas are now popular... not the other way around.
75.
by kube-system 2mo ago
> this is a symptom of a problem that started 10-20 years ago. ... and that's right when social media gained majority adoption among US adults.
76.
by kube-system 2mo ago
He is amplifying the issue, but you're right, Trump is a symptom of the underlying problem. The problem is that internet gave these idiots a platform to mislead people. Back in the early 90s this wasn't much of a problem. Childh
77.
by kube-system 2mo ago
What is this bill blocking that kids want so bad that they'd go through the trouble to do that... and lose blue bubbles with their friends? The ability to receive specifically unsolicited DMs from adult strangers? Opting in to behavi
78.
by kube-system 2mo ago
So what? That's how all laws work. What if I don't rob my local convenience store, but someone else does? Don't make the mistake of logically getting caught up on the idea of laws "preventing crime". They never
79.
by kube-system 2mo ago
> And the bar for compelling any particular speech is generally quite high. Apple could not be compelled to put a backdoor in an iPhone, even though the suspect was the San Bernardino shooter, and this did not result in Apple losing thei
80.
by kube-system 2mo ago
I don't think some people are aware that "large" has always referred to the training inputs not resulting the size of the model. LLM is not "we made a language model and it is big" -- it's "we trained this
81.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Major distros will comply because they want to sell their services in Illinois. I don’t think noncompliance of a container image is much of a “fuck you” since I don’t think lawmakers have ever heard of you nor would they really care about y
82.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Yes, most any law is primary enforced against people within the same legal jurisdiction. It matters less where the server is and more where the relevant people/organizations/assets are. Major OS providers, including major Linux d
83.
by kube-system 2mo ago
I don’t think they’re going to spend any resources on going after you because: * your project might not even qualify under the text of the law * even if it did, the number of children using it to access social media is likely zero
84.
by kube-system 2mo ago
A court will care about what you do in the jurisdictions where it has power over you. What anyone else does is their problem, not yours. Some oddball Linux distro really has no relevance to the larger picture that lawmakers are trying to a
85.
by kube-system 2mo ago
That’s always been the case for things distributed on the internet. It’s irrelevant in terms of evaluating one’s personal compliance with the law.
86.
by kube-system 2mo ago
GP said they wanted to take it to court. I presume that means they wanted to win, in which case the best strategy is to discuss the issue in private with an attorney before making public statements that could undermine your ability to win.
87.
by kube-system 2mo ago
The person you replied to is using "could"/"could not" to mean "would comply with the law"/"would not comply with the law" Nobody here is saying that anyone is going to swoop in and physical
88.
by kube-system 2mo ago
Alright, then let me rephrase: > If "free speech" was a valid defense to any legal compliance laws that affect software, then any software company would raise this defense this rather than comply.
89.
by kube-system 2mo ago
It's not that complicated. If there's a law that says "Anyone who distributes X must also Y" and you can't figure out a way to continue distributing X while also doing Y, the way you comply with the law is that
90.
by kube-system 2mo ago
There is pretty solid case law for the constitutionality of a variety of compliance requirements. If you can comply by being silent then they aren't really compelling you to do say anything.

More ›