kubb

23 ms·

391.
by kubb 11mo ago
I think this is a very common opinion here. I'd say at least 15% people believe that.
392.
by kubb 11mo ago
> Why wouldn't the people who prefer this just take the developer's money, buy another house somewhere that hasn't been rezoned and pocket thousands of dollars? This one is obvious - they want to live close to where they&#
393.
by kubb 11mo ago
So let's say for a moment that you're right and such a policy would be beneficial to the landowners. I'm sure you'll appreciate that it's a great concession — after all, it assumes that they don't have non-fina
394.
by kubb 11mo ago
Competition would have that effect… in a perfect market, which is a theoretical construct. Especially in context of urbanism, building an abomination can hurt the entire community and takes space from proper construction. Here my thoughts a
395.
by kubb 11mo ago
What you need is to require new construction to have a certain density along with building standards (sunlight, insulation, etc.). Just deregulating exposes the land to the whim of the developer’s good will — trusting them not to get the mo
396.
by kubb 11mo ago
They are competing, but not for the customer but for the land, which appreciates. Remember, there are different forms of competition. The "supply constraint" is that the landowners don’t want to change zoning laws, and that space
397.
by kubb 11mo ago
The one thing that makes assumptions about free market forces miss the mark is the fact that ideal markets don’t exist in the real world. I case of housing, in the US, we’re as far from free market as possible. So making assumptions about w
398.
by kubb 11mo ago
Bots and paid trolls online pushing a narrative. With a whole manual of rhetorical tactics.
399.
by kubb 11mo ago
That’s unlikely.
400.
by kubb 11mo ago
Not sure why they care about his opinion and discard yours. They’re just as valid and well informed.
401.
by kubb 11mo ago
You might get humbled by overwhelming complexity one day. Enjoy the illusion of perfect insight until then.
402.
by kubb 11mo ago
The people who worked on it did what they could to satisfy the demands of their higher-up’s, who frequently are out of touch with the technical landscape. Being kind to them and understanding the environment they work in won’t improve their
403.
by kubb 11mo ago
What would have happened is the US platforms would have moved into China and stifled the competition. As we can see everywhere else. This wouldn’t even be good for the US, just good for the shareholders of these companies.
404.
by kubb 11mo ago
Disagree. China has had incredible benefits from its own social media and commerce platform growth. Yeah, the US is missing out.
405.
by kubb 1y ago
What are they worried for? They have severance packages.
406.
by kubb 1y ago
I’m sorry, what kind of rule is that? How does it guarantee security? It sounds like we’re making things up at this point.
407.
by kubb 1y ago
You hit the nail on the head, in my opinion. There are things that you just can’t expect from current LLMs that people routinely expect from them. They start out projects with those expectations. And that’s fine. But they don’t always learn
408.
by kubb 1y ago
It also seems that LLMs are using them correctly — as a pause or replacement for a comma (yes, I know this is an imprecise description of when to use them). Thanks to LLMs I learned that using the short binding dash everywhere is incorrect,
409.
by kubb 1y ago
I’m trying not to be disappointed by people, I’d rather understand what’s going on in their minds, and how to navigate that.
410.
by kubb 1y ago
I was slightly surprised that my colleagues, who are extremely invested in capabilities of LLMs, didn’t show any interest in Karpathy’s communication on the subject when I recommended it to them. Later I understood that they don’t need to u
411.
by kubb 1y ago
Tele is from Greek and vision is Latin, so while you’re at it… Automobile, sociology…
412.
by kubb 1y ago
It looks more elegant than English.
413.
by kubb 1y ago
There were so many people saying that this isn’t going to work. Remember that when discussing any regulation. The „it’s impossible” and „let’s not bother” people are a scourge and they mustn’t be taken seriously.
414.
by kubb 1y ago
Survival of the shittiest?
415.
by kubb 1y ago
Back to feudalism, huh?
416.
by kubb 1y ago
Violence. Unfortunately.
417.
by kubb 1y ago
My ever growing reporting chain is incredibly invested in having autonomous agents next year.
418.
by kubb 1y ago
He probably just doesn’t know how to prompt correctly (heheh).
419.
by kubb 1y ago
The funding round is all that matters. Now he can pay himself 15 million per year plus a severance package and he’s made it.
420.
by kubb 1y ago
Fair criticism.

More ›