ktm5j

5 ms·

61.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
I don't think I've ever seen a kernel or initrd in a container image. The whole point of containers is not to duplicate the kernel, and you definitely don't need an initial ram disk since you already have a running operating
62.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
Well presumably they might take this evidence seriously, since this time they're the ones who hired someone to do the research. Which is why I feel (maybe overly) optimistic that this might finally settle the issue.
63.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
I assumed this was specifically in response to the Reuters deal, so my comment was off-base.
64.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
This may be an unpopular opinion, but is this really the best way to respond here? Won't this just give them the opportunity to claim that California is doing this specifically to hide fraud? $125 mil is a drop in the bucket compared t
65.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
Ben Krasnow is just awesome, highly recommend his channel if anyone is into this kind of thing.
66.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
This is super cool, I've always used ncdu for this kinda thing but I like this a lot better. Thanks for sharing!
67.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
Most people are not going to do that though :/
68.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
That sounds like a fun thing to wonder about, but how could anyone possibly know that for sure?
69.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
It's not supposed to wrap or be responsive.. It's a tradition of making text legible on vintage terminals. I use `fill-paragragh` in emacs to format my commit messages like this 'cause I'm a dork hehe
70.
by ktm5j 3mo ago
There's also stuff like Thinlinc, NoMachine, X2Go and a bunch of others, all of which use SSH as the primary backend. This is a pretty common idea.
71.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
What industry doesn't have a few too many marketers? Take everything with a grain of salt.
72.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
Weird.. I have almost this exact same "cheat sheet" printed out and stuck up on my whiteboard.. except it's slightly different. Only 4 panels instead of 6 and the panels don't have titles. I know this is a solid "co
73.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
If that's really the case (which isn't really clear from this post) then I feel like we're missing some details.
74.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
Yeah that's kind of the impression that I had.. should have ran it past his superiors. Hope he learns something from this instead of deflecting like he seems to be doing.
75.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
It's a paid product, they are actually allowed to do this. Google is obviously going to focus on security testing with their own browser. It's understandable that organizations want to require chrome for their employees to access
76.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
It's their organization. They are allowed to make decisions about what software their employees use. I'm a die-hard Mozilla fan, but I don't find this unreasonable.
77.
US says Trump, Vance and Iran's parliament speaker have signed deal to end war(reuters.com)
4 points by ktm5j 4mo ago|1 comments
78.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
I'd wager on this.
79.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
Well, in that case it totally is their fault...
80.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
VS Code will helpfully warn you when you open a folder that has a git repository.. it asks if you trust the developers since opening the folder could result in bad things happening. So this might not be such a big deal for VS Code users.
81.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
> If you put it into geosynchronous orbit, the transmission is easier but now you've introduced a huge delay in your packets. How does that introduce a delay?
82.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
I used to host email servers for a university, I'm probably going to have nightmares tonight just because I read this post hah
83.
by ktm5j 4mo ago
Oh I love them quite a lot! I use them to run all of our backup jobs, easy to set up and have never had an issue.
84.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
I get what you're saying but I can understand the frustration here. Vivado licenses start at $1200/year or $5000 for a perpetual license.. Just to use software to work with hardware that you already paid for. And it's not lik
85.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
Okay guys, I'm being downvoted for asking questions? Let's be real, OSS has not been proven to be more secure. If you think otherwise then please back it up, I'm okay with being proven wrong.
86.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
Okaaay I'll take a look at the newfangled thingy :P
87.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
No, I'm asking questions...... not pretending I have answers.
88.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
I've heard that argument before, but has that actually been demonstrated? Ability to look at the code (especially in the age of AI) means that security researchers aren't the only ones who can look for bugs. For example, look at t
89.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
Great answer ..
90.
by ktm5j 5mo ago
Can I ask why?

More ›