3 ms·
Well presumably they might take this evidence seriously, since this time they're the ones who hired someone to do the research. Which is why I feel (maybe overl
by ktm5j 3mo ago
Well presumably they might take this evidence seriously, since this time they're the ones who hired someone to do the research. Which is why I feel (maybe overly) optimistic that this might finally settle the issue.
- saghm 3mo agoRecent history would indicate that this will not work out the way you're describing: https://www.propublica.org/article/maricopa-county-arizona-election-records-fbi https://www.propublica.org/article/maricopa-county-arizona-e...
- njovin 3mo agoThis is a core misconception about how the 2020 election results have been investigated. Trump has hired multiple qualified firms to find fraud in the 2020 election and thus far none of the reputable ones have found any. > they might take this evidence seriously Whether the cause is global warming, vaccines, election fraud, the effect of gender rights on society, or any one of the military actions being taken by this admin - the only time evidence matters is when it aligns with their previously -held biases and can be yielded as a weapon. The rest of the time (read: almost all of the time), it doesn't and is swept under the rug or called fake, without any counter-evidence to back that claim up either.