ktm5j

4 ms·

31.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
But weight/mass didn't change one bit (okay exaggeration, but not by much), so maybe peppermint helps relieve gas. Who knows? There's a lot that this data could mean, and no simple way to figure it out.
32.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
I could (sort of) see why you might get this upset if people were required to have a Google account themselves to submit this Google form, but that's not the case. Who are you to tell an underfunded opensource dev company that just l
33.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
I'm so glad we have you and your googling skills to assure us that this is nothing to worry about.
34.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
Calling a book pirated is a legal issue. If the courts bless the idea of AI companies donating the books then there is no legal issue, and I wrong? The point of my last comment is that I don't think either of us are qualified to act li
35.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
Do you really think AI companies are seeking out outdated/unpopular books to train their models on?
36.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
So you're a lawyer and a librarian now? If a library really won't take the books for whatever reason you're imagining, I'm sure there are other organizations that would.
37.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
> The AI training isn't borrowing from libraries and returning from libraries Perhaps that's an important distinction here, I was really just trying to explain what I thought the commenter was trying to say. Calm down with the
38.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
Questions don't imply anything, you're just asking things. I don't have the answers to your questions, but the point is that Google was able to scan books without destroying them while still avoiding legal consequences (with
39.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
Considering their position, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that memory manufacturers say right now. They're the ones taking advantage of the increased demand by increasing prices.
40.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
I think you're missing the point. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure they're trying to point out that this book scanning doesn't need to be destructive. I'm not sure if AI companies are using a scanning metho
41.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
We don't necessarily have to draw that line right now, we're talking about lice. Also, there is no way that dolphins are incapable of emotions, when my dog is capable of emotions. I know there's some disagreement on that subj
42.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
Why would you have empathy for something that is literally incapable of things like empathy. Or any kind of emotion or thought. This is ridiculous guys, you might as well have empathy for a rock.
43.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
My org self hosts the community version of gitlab and we are perfectly happy with it. Manage your own infrastructure, put the work into maintaining it and you'll have much fewer headaches.
44.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
You start with a hunch and then dive into their github repo to confirm that Claude is a top contributor. At least, that's my strategy. Honestly though, I don't care about the website being AI generated. That's not what's
45.
by ktm5j 1mo ago
> This wouldn't have been an issue if the organization bought a $1,000 NAS and populated it with a few hard drives. Okay hang on now.. that strategy comes with its own risks. Risks that I imagine PBS was trying to avoid by using a t
46.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
A lot of people beg to differ. And it's their decision, not yours on when to open source. They have their reasons even if they aren't explaining them to you.
47.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
Some orgs might not want ssh running on user laptops/workstations, so I think that it's a plus to not have that requirement.
48.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
I'm not sure that analogy flies. Technically they did inform him of the price change ahead of time, they just didn't do a very good job. If I were them I'd add "PRICE CHANGE" or similar to the email subject, I feel
49.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
It will fix the problem of having paid $3000. Just want to add that while Hover might not be at fault, I don't think OP is either. I would have done the same thing (read the first renewal email and ignored the rest). I think Hover shou
50.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
And by the way, men are allowed to have opinions about abortion. You can't just play the woman card and act like that changes anything men might have to say.
51.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
Thinking about what they're doing and what those things mean.. some people just do what they want without putting a lot of thought into anything. We shouldn't make it easy for that type of person to hide from what they're doi
52.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
I am a woman. And I only said that last part because I'm sick of seeing the internet hide contrary opinions just because they don't want to hear something.
53.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
What does that matter? You're the one making the decision, not nature. Personally I would give anything to be able to have a child, so honestly I don't understand why anyone would want to terminate a pregnancy. I'm willing to
54.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
I think you're over estimating how self-aware a lot of people are.
55.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
So does life insurance.. but we still have that.
56.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
Okay, you want to have that worry hanging over your head be my guest. Something, someday is going to break. Hope it's not something important that didn't get delivered, cause it'll be your fault.
57.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
I used to run mail servers for a university and I also suggest that no one should do this. It's hard enough to get right when it's your full time job. No one wants that kind of headache just for an email address. Do what I do and
58.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
Well Apple isn't making amd64 systems anymore, so software support will naturally start to waver.
59.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
That's just how things go. But, existing Oracle JDK versions will continue to work, and openjdk might continue to support osx/amd64 as a target.. so I wouldn't worry too much about this.
60.
by ktm5j 2mo ago
Well, that appears to be the exact problem that they're trying to solve with spir-v. > The shift SPIR-V enables is from ahead-of-time compilation per target to compile once, just-in-time specialize on device.

More ›