kt315_

4 ms·

1.
by kt315_ 7y ago
While no 503s were observed in the test, there were timeouts. I updated the article with corresponding graph.
2.
by kt315_ 7y ago
None of the tested webservers were returning 503.
3.
by kt315_ 7y ago
Sleeping is done with setTimeout: https://gitlab.com/stressgrid/dummies/blob/b342b02407ce09cec... This isn't busy wait. Instead it yields for specified time period, much like network request to the backe
4.
Show HN: Packets-per-Second Limits in EC2(stressgrid.com)
1 points by kt315_ 7y ago|0 comments
5.
by kt315_ 8y ago
We are preparing new benchmark test for major platforms. Among other suggestions it will include memory consumption.
6.
by kt315_ 8y ago
Author here. We tried number of acceptors that was 4x and 16x number of cores without any difference.
7.
by kt315_ 8y ago
With Gun it is also possible to create a specialized process structure albeit with more heavyweight processes behind each connection. Mint provides lightweight (possibly more efficient?) abstraction to achieve similar results. Thanks Eric a
8.
by kt315_ 8y ago
I think Gun has very similar philosophy, e.g. it is connection oriented and does not impose pooling and such.
9.
by kt315_ 8y ago
What is the advantage over Gun? ( https://ninenines.eu/docs/en/gun/1.3/manual/ )
10.
by kt315_ 8y ago
One of the benchmark goals was to test "scheduling" efficiency of each runtime. In other words to show how well it scales given many-core instance, which often is more economical in transaction/$$ sense. Question: how using c
11.
by kt315_ 8y ago
What would be the good Java web server to test?
12.
by kt315_ 8y ago
Good point, will add.
13.
by kt315_ 8y ago
Author here. Planning to run the same test using cluster module with one worker per CPU. What would be the most performant way to serve HTTP in Go?