Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ksk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
77 ms
·
721.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
I wasn't trying to be. I was mildly annoyed that this person was being needlessly pendantic about an irrelevant point that doesn't matter in any way whatsoever in the real world. They failed to give an example that matters.
722.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
While you can easily add the adapter, you are using the lens in a way it is not designed for. It will work for various definitions of work, and casual users might never even notice the difference. But it will never be equivalent to its nati
723.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
I see, so not relevant in the real world. Thanks!
724.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
Where does it matter? Can you give an example?
725.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
The bug is in humans. Heck, I regularly come across people who think the case in an email address matters! While there is no bug in Gmail, that is irrelevant because you have to deal with the reality of how people use your product. Its basi
726.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Arguably, this is an attitude problem on the demand side - people who want to buy other people like they're pieces of meat - rather than something about the supply, or the trade itself. Yes, which soliciting sex is also prohibited.
727.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>At the same time many people will blame a prostitute for their lifestyle, yet the very same people will marry/date for money. No idea what imagined point you're replying to. >By the way you may find exchanging sex for money
728.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>That's basically the argument against capitalism and wage-labor, sure. Yeah, we also don't allow child labor. I assume you don't have a problem with that? Capitalism doesn't work by itself. Human beings are social an
729.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
TBH, that sounds sensible to me. Keep in mind that the words mean nothing without judicial process. In most cases vague language is intentionally introduced to give the judge latitude in handing out judgements. The stricter the language, th
730.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>and some larger studies, suggest the availability of such online services actually reduce violence, homicide, and sex trafficking. See for example: What study was this and how do we know its results are accurate and apply in this case?
731.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
Do you want less or more user control? Or should Apple control everything? I'm certainly not a fan of Apple but I respect their ability to mostly just stick the to basics of you give me $100 and I give you this product of equal (sic) v
732.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
Sorry, don't want to waste my time any further. Its obvious to me that you have zero actual evidence, and no knowledge of what was done, or what was overlooked. Goodbye.
733.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Why should people have the right to have things they don't like wiped from the historical record? Because a judicial process made that determination. Random people don't decide anything, they petition. As an aside, there absol
734.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
I don't see a number.
735.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
It is unethical to ship non-essential/luxury features containing known defects which could lead to someone's death.
736.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
While its true that a layperson usually never knows more about the business than the actual person whose doing it (which I assume was your point), most of the failed products from Goog indicate faulty biz assumptions/inaccurate market
737.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>That's irrelevant when we are talking about a company being paid specifically to audit something. The entire world is able to send me food as well, but I don't get mad when it doesn't except for when I pay someone to do i
738.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>In fact, medical devices seem actually counter to your argument. No one says an automatic defibrillator's decisions as to when to fire are going to be as good as a human doctor, and in fact these things have non-zero (often fatal)
739.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Perhaps. I reject this argument though. A death is a death. A death caused by shitty engineering (e.g. Tesla in this case) is not the same as a death caused by gross negligence on ones own part. >And if you prevent lifesaving technol
740.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>That even leaves aside the clear point that a Tesla on autopilot is significantly less likely to make any of those mistakes... What are you basing this on? Specifically how is it 'clear' and what data has shown this to be 
741.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Root access should be protected, and any bugs that break this barrier without the user's credentials should be fixed/prevented. >The root user should have absolute power to do anything. This is the basic ethos of Linux. The
742.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Surprise surprise, he's the founder of a company selling a service to help people erase shit from google. You mean like all of the other front page links about people selling their stuff? Or people who blatantly link directly to pr
743.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
Looks like you want the government to implement a perfect law that works in every case and will never be misused. Perhaps you could propose one? :)
744.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>but the academic world has perhaps gone too far in focusing on this aspect and too little on making sure that the created knowledge is applied. Okay, now I understand the point. But why is it necessarily the responsibility of a research
745.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
You are choosing to not engage with the author and simply repeating your own opinion. Its obvious to me that your disagreement is actually not even relevant to the article or to what the author is saying. >There is no statement about giv
746.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
I think its a perfect analogy. >because the Linux project isn't dedicated to auditing the Linux project. Huh? Code Review? Testing? The entire point of open source especially w.r.t security is to have millions of eyes on the source.
747.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Paying directly for a product that you're going to use creates a beautiful alignment of interests. Even Microsoft wasn't as beautifully aligned as Apple was/is because Windows was sold to CIOs and IT departments and not t
748.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>Ok. So Facebook monitors Messenger (not just your public "wall" of Facebook) which has the appearance of being private person to person communication and detects that there are encouragements of violence in Myanmar (written I
749.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
Thats like saying Linux is a useless project because of giant security holes that stay hidden for decades. I prefer to live in the real world, which is a lot more nuanced, and my question still stands.
750.
▲
by
ksk
9y ago
>It's worth pointing out that KPMG was Wells Fargo's independent auditor while the bank recently committed fraud on a massive scale by creating more than a million fake deposit accounts and 560,000 credit card applications for
More ›