Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kshri24
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
Amazon Has a Problem [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
kshri24
7mo ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
Become an engineer, not just a slop cannon [video]
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
kshri24
7mo ago
|
0 comments
63.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
Isn't the meaning of milquetoast opposite to what you are probably trying to convey?
64.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
The problem is finding the needle in the haystack. When you can cheaply develop AI slop by the millions, good luck finding that one game where a human put blood, sweat and tears to realize their vision/dream. Even if you somehow have a
65.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
So tired of AI slop! Please use the tech creatively. This is not it!
66.
▲
How locked in are we? [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
kshri24
7mo ago
|
0 comments
67.
▲
This 18 year old has 12 $200 Codex Plans
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
kshri24
7mo ago
|
1 comments
68.
▲
Amazon is regretting AI [video]
(youtube.com)
5 points
by
kshri24
7mo ago
|
1 comments
69.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
This probably only works properly in the developed countries. In developing countries like India we suffered through decades of "booth captures" [1] where armed gangs would take over a polling booth and cast votes for their politi
70.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
Thank you! Please also make a separate Show HN for AI-generated/vibe-coded projects (specifically open-source projects) and queue any project that has a .claude/.codex (or whatever flavor of the month) into a slow queue automatica
71.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
> Apart from that, you have answered to a strawman. I said redistribute, not give to the government You said: "let's just tax the hell out of AI companies and redistribute.". Only the Government has the power to tax. Quest
72.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
Pension fund is an example of what exactly? All countries have pension funds. This has nothing to do with Governments wasting money. Please go beyond tiny European countries that have very few verticals and are largely dependent on outside
73.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
> let's just tax the hell out of AI companies and redistribute. That's not what I favor because you are inserting a middleman, the Government, into the mix. The Government ALWAYS wants to maximize tax collections AND fully util
74.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
I don't disagree. However, just because your assertion of copyright being initially defined by US (which is not the fact. It was England that came up with it and was adopted by the Commonwealth which US was also a part of until its ind
75.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
I agree with your assessment. Which is why I was proposing a middle-ground where an agreement is setup between the model training company and the collective of developers/artists et all and come up with a license agreement where they a
76.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
This hasn't gone to Supreme Court yet. And this is just USA. Courts in rest of the World will also have to take a call. It is not as simple as you make it out to be. Developers are spread across the World with majority living outside U
77.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
Why is it impractical? Github already has a sponsor system. Also this can be a form of UBI.
78.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
> LLM ingestion comes under fair use I don't think so. It is no where "limited use". Entirety of the source code is ingested for training the model. In other words, it meets the bar of "heart of the work" being u
79.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
> Unfortunately, there is a dumb clause that computer generated code cannot be copyrighted or licensed to begin with. Can you point to the clause? I have never seen it in any GPL license.
80.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
> The ownership void: If the code is truly a “new” work created by a machine, it might technically be in the public domain the moment it’s generated, rendering the MIT license moot. How would that work? We still have no legal conclusion
81.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
I don't think you can classify "public data in" as public domain. Public data could also include commercial licenses which forbid using it in any way other than what the license states. Just because the source is open for vie
82.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
> I’m starting to think that’s going to be personality and feel and polish, but turned up a notch. That’s what I used to do when I started writing apps, but in some ways I have really toned it down in favor of OS alignment. That's a
83.
▲
by
kshri24
7mo ago
My only gripe with Rust is Rust-Analyzer taking up so much of my system's resources. And I know it is not really fixable which is a bummer.
84.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
There is a bug in the time series charts. Data needs to be normalized prior to charting. For example: https://cia-factbook-archive.fly.dev/archive/field/IN/Broadb...
85.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
> Now China is a poor little developing country which is vulnerable to the USA dumping their low-cost goods onto them. It is not about being poor or little per se, but more about being developing. Just because China is second in GDP and
86.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
None of them have country wide tariffs (not counting reciprocal tariffs imposed after Trump imposed tariffs). US has nearly double the GDP of second in line: China. It can easily dump goods at lower cost compared to China or any other count
87.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
> same outrage about tariffs Because US is a developed country. US should not be imposing tariffs and taxing its own citizens for zero gains. > about punishment and such Tariffs is like taking a battle-axe and hacking your own foot. S
88.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
Please study why tariffs exist in the first place. It is not to punish a country. It is used as protection from a stronger adversary, especially by developing countries, for balancing trade disparities. Not everything can be lop-sided in fa
89.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
Tariffs are great for developing countries. It protects their nascent industries/businesses that are not even ready to compete with those from developed countries and specifically to prevent developed countries from dumping goods (look
90.
▲
by
kshri24
8mo ago
Yep! Quit LinkedIn when it went downhill. Has only gotten worse since then. Most social media is filled with AI slop. For someone who grew up in the 90s-2000s BBS/IRC era this sucks!
More ›