ksaj

22 ms·

301.
by ksaj 3y ago
You really need to remove the tinfoil hat. It's even affecting your ability to read. When I mentioned polarization of laser, you ignored everything except one phrase. I said, specifically (but I'll be more specific this time), tha
302.
by ksaj 3y ago
Do a study on your special DNA to see why it is so different than normal DNA from everything that has DNA. That's the only way to get to the end of this, apparently.
303.
by ksaj 3y ago
You mean like why even a tiny sliver of light after an eclipse will totally toast your eyes.
304.
by ksaj 3y ago
Well, you'll be safe at either the North or South Pole, then. The only places on the planet that don't have Starlink flying over (yet).
305.
by ksaj 3y ago
Indeed. It's like they did this without having ever met a colour blind person. Blinking Dazzle Camouflage isn't the first thing that would come to most people's mind.
306.
by ksaj 3y ago
Correct. By definition, polarized waves of any kind are less "potent" since their contact surface is greatly diminished. It's the difference between the line of radius*2 and a filled circle, the radius squared times pi. Big d
307.
by ksaj 3y ago
It's like saying you should not be worried about your peanut allergy if the peanuts are 10km away. Your exposure is not at a level that your body will react negatively to it.
308.
by ksaj 3y ago
Actually, this is a perfectly good point - arcade games had their CRTs on a 45 degree angle, some on portrait and some on landscape direction, and they showed no "intermediate" effects that you'd expect if this gravity claim
309.
by ksaj 3y ago
This is worse than the Japanese cartoons that people claimed made them convulse. When they paint ships like this, they call it Dazzle Camouflage because it is so hard to focus on. It's literally a military tactic meant to mess with you
310.
by ksaj 3y ago
Make up your mind. You keep saying one thing, then the other. People have proven over and over again that the radiation from the satellites is too low to be a danger to you at this distance, and the same goes for the terminals, which are wh
311.
by ksaj 3y ago
Then, just like the cell tower examples people have already given you, proximity is very much a differentiator between safe and not safe. We're really far away from those satellites. And people have already shown how low the radiation
312.
by ksaj 3y ago
Light reflecting off a lake is polarized. That's why polarized filters remove the glare in lake photos, etc. All reflected light is polarized (or at least partly polarized, since some surfaces are quite rough, and except when reflected
313.
by ksaj 3y ago
Everybody loved the degaussing sound and visuals. Young people don't know what they're missing.
314.
by ksaj 3y ago
I'm more inclined to blame that on the buzzy neon tube lights overhead, and the computers sitting under them.
315.
by ksaj 3y ago
To me, this sounds a lot like the directional flow of toilets flushing. I'd have to see this as an actual experiment before I can be convinced of what the webopedia page is claiming. Check out my previous comment on the time a friend a
316.
by ksaj 3y ago
I just sent an email to my old high school buddy. I'm sure this is incorrect, and I've asked him for his remembrance of something we did on a lark. One night David Letterman did an episode where throughout the show, the camera(s)
317.
by ksaj 3y ago
How about this one: "This analysis demonstrates that the SpaceX CP terminal is not a radiation hazard because the terminal does not exceed the MPE limit of 1 mW/cm2 averaged over a thirty-minute period." https
318.
by ksaj 3y ago
This is an interesting move. Almost like pay-to-play, but possibly actually beneficial, since contributing to the code base both helps the app, and helps the developer by having that on their CV.
319.
by ksaj 3y ago
Yes, in the same way you are exposed to every other cell signal that can reach you, every television station that can reach you, every radio that can reach you, every radar used to track planes in the sky, and so on. A receiver receives. So
320.
by ksaj 3y ago
We had this here in Toronto as well. Apparently you can take tours of some of the equipment.
321.
by ksaj 3y ago
It would be a great game title. And that's the problem -- it's apparently not a game. Comparing it to Flickr et al isn't doing it justice unless there is a fun "sharing" component to the app. The 3 makes it fun and
322.
by ksaj 3y ago
Yea, I think you could only write a COM file, since they are single segment "memory images". And 64kB was indeed the limit for a memory segment in those days. Depending on what you were doing, even a ^C character in a script would
323.
by ksaj 3y ago
If you would have asked me in high school what I wanted to do for a career, it had absolutely nothing to do with computing, even though I grew up tweens onward around computers. The opportunities were interesting to me, and as things progre
324.
by ksaj 3y ago
What got me into assembly programming was my peecee getting infected with the STONED virus at the end of the 80's. DOS came with a small very thick binder user manual, and the DEBUG.EXE section was very extensive. It seemed to me that
325.
by ksaj 3y ago
Yes, this is too pricy for something that shows no examples, and the author asking for improvement advice. I only kinda get what it does, but without examples, I can't tell if it's something that you could just straight up ask Cha
326.
by ksaj 3y ago
The text box seemingly has nothing to do with anything you've clicked on. I was zoomed in to Toronto, looking at the few points there, and the text in the too-small scrolling box was about Norfolk Virginia. That's pretty strange.
327.
by ksaj 3y ago
I've read the most contradicting views on what to expect from the stock market in 2024. Yes, it'll continue going down at least until the traditional February bump. But I've seen a lot of things saying that afterward, we star
328.
by ksaj 3y ago
One of my favourite DOS things was the DEBUG.EXE command. As far as I know, it was the only debugger that allows for the creation of debug files where you could do things like debug.exe < script.dbg to do low level things like replacing
329.
by ksaj 3y ago
I have an account on sdf.org, and of course they have a usenet feed. I have viewed it on occasion, but realize there is so much more spam than actual content, I just lost interest. That's too bad. I mean, it was always spammy, but not
330.
by ksaj 3y ago
I always say that people should treat GPTs the same way we're taught to use Wikipedia. Find what you're looking for, and then verify that it is correct. It is not difficult to use a search engine to verify any claims that are ne

More ›