kristerv

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by kristerv 9y ago

   i like the idea that tuesday is the day off. Makes sense.
2. 62.▲
   by kristerv 9y ago

   I seem to have this thing for honesty. If I intend to "work from home" but really do everything but, then I'd rather just work out some deal. Plus I like coming to the office, it's social.
3. 63.▲
   by kristerv 9y ago

   haha, good point. Though I prefer being productive on and off work time :)
4. 64.▲
   Going for the 5 hour workday(code.krister.ee)

   334 points by kristerv 9y ago|186 comments
5. 65.▲
   by kristerv 9y ago

   yeah, drugs. Fastest solution to all problems. But my actual solution is basically putting my mindset in a zero position (i don't even work for this company) and imagine what I would love to do right now. Then figure out if this compan
6. 66.▲
   Markdownsites.com – post-mortem(code.krister.ee)

   4 points by kristerv 10y ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   by kristerv 10y ago

   yeah +1 to this. Perhaps Rumuki is just a new material source for pornhub? :D
8. 68.▲
   by kristerv 10y ago

   haha, great. Awesome landing btw. I'd love to be updated on how your project goes. Blog?
9. 69.▲
   The paper clip project(teleport.org)

   14 points by kristerv 10y ago|0 comments
10. 70.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    incredible response. Thank you for the effort. Quite an eye opener. Like didn't think about subdomains that way - valuable insight. SSL is top3 on my todo list. Currently I charge extra for the domain - seems to be a simple way of doin
11. 71.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    > splat some markdown to the internet haha, great tagline I must say :D
12. 72.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    interesting, i'll keep an eye out for your release. Incredible UI design btw.
13. 73.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    for sure, top3 issue to work on.
14. 74.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    wow that's awesome.
15. 75.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    I can't recall the exact details, but I did try to use as few services as possible. I think the problem was something about how namecheap's pricing model worked. Or was it the site that didn't have a customizeable paying popu
16. 76.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    perhaps I didn't understand what jekyll was capable of. I'm going to have a proper look at all the tech suggested here.
17. 77.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    nice. thanks for the tip. I'll see how plausible this is for my usecase.
18. 78.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    you are certainly right about the familiarity. Also some of the ideas proposed here have been very valuable, i'll be sure to check them out.
19. 79.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    haha, best quote i've heard in a long time :D
20. 80.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    thank you :)
21. 81.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    totally right here.
22. 82.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    Thanks for the encouraging words. HN is a technical forum, so the critical responses are understandable. Not that I don't take them seriously :)
23. 83.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    thank you :)
24. 84.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    Could you perhaps point out some specific details that you find annoying?
25. 85.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    Even though the site is simple development time has been severely dropped thanks to choosing a fairly heavy platform.
26. 86.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    yeah the idea is just to be as simple as possible.
27. 87.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    thanks for the input. You may be right on this one. We'll see.
28. 88.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    yep, i completely agree. The only reason it's JS heavy is because it's a MVP. If this project turns out well it will end up being a simple HTML with bare-minimum javascript.
29. 89.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    good point. it's something I myself would also like. I'll have a think about this. I'll also have a look at ublock. I also use it, haven't had problems. Maybe you tried exactly when the site was down. Had overload proble
30. 90.▲
    by kristerv 10y ago

    thanks :)