krick

79 ms·

961.
by krick 6y ago
Yes it does. Why do you even ask instead of just trying?
962.
by krick 6y ago
Not sure about "legal battles", but I don't think it will be quite as it was. It was always wise to keep existence of youtube-dl sort of public secret, since our, ehm, data sources were never keen of it in the first place. Ev
963.
by krick 6y ago
That's surprising to hear. What do you use for this purpose then?
964.
by krick 6y ago
So, was there some decision about the actual youtube-dl project future? Is it moving somewhere? Or is everything on hiatus?
965.
by krick 6y ago
> If you have gotten this far and think this is a self-indulgent pity party, please just stop reading. I don't judge (actually I feel for this guy), but let's be honest: isn't it? And this email just reinforces the idea.
966.
by krick 6y ago
Good bookmarking app is something that I would actually pay for without hesitation (and I'm not very generous with software subscriptions and such). But what I'm absolutely not going to use is bookmarking or note-taking app, stori
967.
by krick 6y ago
No idea where you come from with your experience, and honestly I don't care. Suffice to say that it is absolutely not the case in my reality.
968.
by krick 6y ago
Yeah... People act upset because they spend money on a product they cannot use. It's not for me to discuss if it's even legal, but if it is, then the only thing to discuss is if it's fair, which is a philosophical question. I
969.
by krick 6y ago
This is ridiculously accurate and totally makes sense.
970.
by krick 6y ago
Huh, I didn't expect for Australia to be anti-record holder. Why is that the case?
971.
by krick 6y ago
Yep. In fact, it feels to me as if you are softening things up quite a bit: sure, glorifying the military is something that every country (read as "government") tries to do, but I don't really know any modern example other
972.
by krick 6y ago
Yeah, I was contemplating to maybe start a Twitter account, but didn't because of that. They do this pretty much on every account creation after a couple of hours, I guess so that you'd have some time to get on the hook. I'm
973.
by krick 6y ago
> What kind of values are [<whitespace>a] and [a<whitespace>] supposed to be? I don't understand the qustion. They are supposed to be exactly that, [<whitespace>a] and [a<whitespace>]. I assure you, I've
974.
by krick 6y ago
So, this is basically YAML, "but better". I can repeat once more that "easily understood and used by both programmers and non-programmers" is unapologetically stupid concept that can never succeed. So I see how all of th
975.
by krick 6y ago
> redefinition of the speed of light as the speed of causality Since when this is redefinition? As far as I understand, this was always the definition. In fact, calling it the speed of light was always a bit misleading, since, first of
976.
by krick 6y ago
I wouldn't call it very reasonable. I mean, I understand him, and he is correct in the essence. But... > whatever you are using to generate that particualr text output is incorrectly using bold formatting for bright colors The probl
977.
by krick 6y ago
Thanks, I guess I can make use of one. I was thinking there might be no more devices left that don't store your data on some shitty website you have to log into.
978.
by krick 6y ago
That's an interesting perspective. If I think about it this way, it seems obvious that doing random bullshit when you can do anything is like... quintessence of stupid. On the other hand, if this is obviously stupid , there must be so
979.
by krick 6y ago
I'm not sure I see it. Do you perhaps use Chrome yourself and hence the implication? Because it seems everyone just says "browser" regardless of if it's Safari, Edge, Firefox or something else (but it's a fact that
980.
by krick 6y ago
I believe that this is absolutely the case. In fact, this is kind of the point. No way we would have Wikipedia if it did demand much structure from the very beginning. I don't see it possible (and, in fact, I don't want it to happ
981.
by krick 6y ago
I don't want to say anything negative about them, because both are fine initiative on their own. But I'm not hugely optimistic about them (yet). Both can succeed, but both are pretty far from what I'd consider succeeding. Fir
982.
by krick 6y ago
I'm pretty confident I don't want this. I'd like to be proven wrong, but there was maybe a couple of cases among hundreds when perfectly working UI was actually improved instead of fucking broken by "getting a new look&q
983.
by krick 6y ago
They fired everyone who would've been worth promoting already.
984.
by krick 6y ago
> it'd be unfair on their families WTF of an excuse that is?!
985.
by krick 6y ago
"The most insane document of all time" is not the point. It is good to make documents unreadable, sure, but they still must be valid, and you have to be sure they are valid, before you use them in the battle. However close to the
986.
by krick 6y ago
Any of these thoughts are valid only under the assumption that one is concerned if something is written by GPT-3 or a human. But nobody cares. I would gladly read Wikipedia written by GPT-3, if it can rewrite math articles in a less fucked-
987.
by krick 6y ago
We've been repeating the word "bad" for the last couple of weeks here, but I don't really remember any insights on what can happen long term (and I'm asking, because I have absolutely no idea). I mean, let's su
988.
by krick 6y ago
It's not that I wouldn't like to share some, but this question is simply too generic for me to be able to answer it like that.
989.
by krick 6y ago
Looking 10 years into the future, do we really need x86 though? Is it not possible that Intel will loose and CISC will become basically obsolete? (Yeah, I'm ignoring AMD here for no good reason, but we were talking about nVidia vs Inte
990.
by krick 6y ago
> The $40bn is partly in Nvidia's (arguably) inflated stock I'm not seeing this in the article. How much of it is in Nvidia's arguably inflated stock?

More ›