krick

43 ms·

571.
by krick 3y ago
Well, to be fair, pretty much each of these points apply to all other CI tools in existence.
572.
by krick 3y ago
Yeah, but no. "We hope to continue our working relationship and are discussing how he can continue his work at OpenAI" is not the same as "returning to OpenAI as CEO" and "returns as President". Not very subtle
573.
by krick 3y ago
Well, for starters, we all know that while realistically it's not unusual for a company to have a mission-critical person, it is very undesirable. So much so everybody must pretend that this is just unacceptable and surely isn't a
574.
by krick 3y ago
Surely they don't do it without a reason. And I don't know what the reason is, but I must assume it's some financial benefit (read, tax evasion), and not our opinion.
575.
by krick 3y ago
If I would be betting, I would bet on Altman and Microsoft as well, because in the real world, evil usually wins, but I'm just really astonished by all this rhetoric here on HN. Like, firing Altman is a horrible treason, and people wou
576.
by krick 3y ago
It's really funny how just a couple of days ago people were commenting here how "no way it's gonna happen". Because, you know, they were working for idea, and wouldn't just sell off to Microsoft…
577.
by krick 3y ago
Hmm, curious, what this is about? I click. > On a sunny morning last December, Iyus Ruswandi, a 35-year-old furniture maker in the village of Gunungguruh, Indonesia, was woken up early by his mother ...Ok, closing that bullshit, let&#x27
578.
by krick 3y ago
> Why not just say, “the board has made the difficult decision to part ways with Altman”? That's hardly any different. Nobody makes a difficult decision without any reason, and it's not like they really explained the reason.
579.
by krick 3y ago
This looks like something I could use. Maybe not revolutional, but I do that from time to time, and even if only for organizational purposes it seems to make sense to store that stuff as a bucnh of configuration files for some external tool
580.
by krick 3y ago
> we as a society decided we were ok with criminalizing the types of transactions that can be used to hide crime I'm not event sure that we, as a society, actually did decide that. When, how? Was there a vote, a referendum? I cannot
581.
by krick 3y ago
Is this about USA, or does it happen, like, in EU?
582.
by krick 3y ago
What does it mean, specifically, "compiler team for AI"? I get it that it's some hot new trend from the last 2 posts, but I'm struggling to imagine what exactly the perfect product should look like and why everyone wants
583.
by krick 3y ago
> democratically balancing consumer rights Right. By stepping farther from the open market and killing some personal freedom. (Also, word "democratically" is absolutely meaningless in this context, but that's the usual mod
584.
by krick 3y ago
It is a great idea, but with a caveat: communism is a great idea too, and pretty much in the same sense. I can say that about most of the propositions in this thread. I, as a user (and a vim-user, may I add), would like it very much if all
585.
by krick 3y ago
Yeah, but the thing is, gzip isn't "these days". It was a thing long before UMAP and even MNIST itself. And the approach isn't perticulary novel too, this is a very simple idea, if you do understand compression. It could
586.
by krick 3y ago
Somebody please bother to explain why this is downvoted. The reasoning seems perfectly valid. Of course, there are a lot of ways how somebody could fuck up, but in theory automated builds on github have the same trustworthiness guarantees
587.
by krick 3y ago
You're missing the point. GP is discussing binaries. I.e., the assumption is that published source code (on Github) is perfectly fine, and then either the (malign) developer is changing the code before compiling it, or the (malign) thi
588.
by krick 3y ago
I was nodding in agreement until "naming conventions". Naming conventions and common notation is really bad. To the point, that it's sometimes easier to invent your own for personal use.
589.
by krick 3y ago
> ISO/IEC 5218 Look… How often are you referred to ISO/IEC 5218 standard, honestly? Me — it very well might be that you're my first. But it's nice it's there. If it wasn't, I wouldn't be very sad, becau
590.
by krick 3y ago
> Laypersons have no idea what the heck is ISO 8601 anyway Damn, that's a great point for sure. Then what's the point of having a standard if "nobody has any idea" what it is and and you are supposed to define all the
591.
by krick 3y ago
It's also a CLI, a daemon, a network abstraction, a company… It just doesn't make any sense to try to count how many things "docker" is. It makes sense to ask which "docker" do you mean when you talk about &quo
592.
by krick 3y ago
Honestly, it doesn't seem to me that the author knows what he is is talking about anyway.
593.
by krick 3y ago
I mean, that post is a grand oversimplification to the point of being basically wrong on so many levels, that I'm not even sure why do you pick specifically that point to argue about. Even though you are totally right.
594.
by krick 3y ago
> Dockerfiles on their own are usually missing a lot of critical information about how to run the container Uh, of course they do, since they say nothing about how to run a container. Dockerfiles encode an image (also not really dete
595.
by krick 3y ago
How do you actually get a number like that? What are the computations, simplified? Is it a coincidence that 1280 = 2⁷ * 10? (I mean, it makes me wonder if it isn't basically a result of using some sort of a decision tree splitting so
596.
by krick 3y ago
Yes, that's what I mean by "obvious". And I mean to say that it's REALLY important IMO. The point of having a standard is to abandon ALL other ways of representing a DT (or at least go as far as possible in that directio
597.
by krick 3y ago
It's "funny" how both RFC 3339 and ISO 8601 standards include a huge number of redundant DT formats with often overlapping purposes, yet "2023-09-01 15:30:59", which is by far most used DT format (because it's
598.
by krick 3y ago
What even distracts them? IDEs are supposedly the only thing they do. Well, maybe except for Kotlin. And it's not like their IDEs are very cheap either. I mean, not that cheep that I'd like the idea of being too much mentally inve
599.
by krick 3y ago
Any examples? I don't write Python that much nowadays, and while I'm sure its type checker doesn't do everything , I kinda never felt disappointed by what it does. Maybe, a considerable part of that is that I still don'
600.
by krick 3y ago
I would really appreciate just an ffmpeg wrapper with better CLI. It is unnecessarily convoluted, and while I don't know if there's a point of view from which it actually all makes sense, it is just inadequate in performing all so

More ›