kreetx

21 ms·

421.
by kreetx 2y ago
I know its required to store this count such that the filesystem would know when it can actually delete the inode, but isn't this half-way to making the inode aware of the paths pointing to it?
422.
by kreetx 2y ago
I'd say Haskell is even simpler than Rust: the syntactic sugar of monads/do-notation makes writing parsers easy. The same sugar transfers to most other problem domains.
423.
by kreetx 2y ago
Yes, a long time ago [0]. Depending on your needs, stack might still have advantages as the direct tool used by the developer (as it uses cabal underneath anyway). [0] https://stackoverflow.com/a/51016806/4126514
424.
by kreetx 2y ago
It's definitely necessary: it provides an answer for those who do have knowledge about parsing, read this and wonder why didn't the author do this other often used practice instead.
425.
by kreetx 2y ago
It only says that ochlocracy is "mob-rule, perhaps better described as rule by demagogues", which is still too vague of a criteria. It also seems to me that whenever anyone doesn't win an election, then the competition, the v
426.
by kreetx 2y ago
IMO, the entire number counting argument is beside the point. Workable dev count/user count ratio varies depending on circumstances. A better way would have been that the "in-house Flutter team is slow to accept outside contributi
427.
by kreetx 2y ago
Ruby has plenty of other applications written in it, it definitely doesn't belong to the "one app" language list.
428.
by kreetx 2y ago
I don't think GitHub, or any other git host, will have objections to using it once it's part of mainline git? Also, thank you for the TLDR!
429.
by kreetx 2y ago
Not OP, but: > How do you enforce it? I don't think you can. You just rely on the the developer to only create compiling commits (if possible). Also, code review might catch these. > Because with rebase you're much more like
430.
by kreetx 2y ago
This seems similar to instead of storing any specific part (int, string, array) of JSON, just store any JSON type in the column, much like "enum with fields" in Swift, Kotlin or Rust, or algebraic data types in Haskell - a feature
431.
by kreetx 2y ago
This is about creating and using a domain-restricted CA , which is then used to create server certificates. Point being that your (tech savvy) friends are willing to install the CA because it can only ever validate some specific subdomains
432.
by kreetx 2y ago
mkcert might be getting this as well: https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert/pull/309/commits/92215... (this is linked from the current submission's readme)
433.
by kreetx 2y ago
This is for an internal network.
434.
by kreetx 2y ago
I think the reason is that you don't want existing codebases to start erroring with the default setting.
435.
by kreetx 2y ago
A history of four submissions in 10 years?
436.
by kreetx 2y ago
There was also was WASH[1] way before blaze. Given the minimal syntactic overhead and the do-syntax overload/Monad type class, Haskell is a great language to do these embedded DSLs in. [1] http://www2.informatik.uni-freiburg
437.
by kreetx 2y ago
Not disagreeing with you on the memory safety. It's just that the way "written in Rust" is used, it seems like a marketing gimmick to invite anyone who knows (or maybe wants to learn) Rust. Shows (IMO!) the weakness of the pr
438.
by kreetx 2y ago
Right, but I suspect people would like to use it to run VMs rather than start developing it. If the indent is to invite developers who "know rust", then that is the wrong measuring bar (IMO, of course), as you'd want develope
439.
by kreetx 2y ago
It seems as if the implementation detail is the feature. Can't the program stand for itself?
440.
by kreetx 2y ago
Would guess regular wired headphones/earplugs, as bluetooth has a lag which is pretty bad for gaming.
441.
by kreetx 2y ago
Who is "we"? I, nor any parents I know, actually are.
442.
by kreetx 2y ago
The solution is simply not to engage. The expectation of the author appears to be that everybody must change into using a social behavior they expect. I'd ask, why don't they change themselves instead? ;)
443.
by kreetx 2y ago
Same here. I don't doubt that people sometimes argue here "unpolotely", though, IMO, the solution is simply not to engage.
444.
by kreetx 2y ago
Looks like the 2021 situation at 37signals.
445.
by kreetx 2y ago
Yup, as a Haskeller, it's important to remember that rebinding means something else in other languages.
446.
by kreetx 2y ago
I don't and I've never used gh. Haven't thus far found anyone else complaining about this either.
447.
by kreetx 2y ago
Hmm, interesting, I'll hope it's a bug for those who have it. (Anyone else see it at all?)
448.
Tell HN: GitHub now recommends using its own `gh` tool to clone repositories
8 points by kreetx 2y ago|6 comments
449.
by kreetx 2y ago
I fully agree. The blog post is essentially a long winded way of saying that there isn't a compatible way to safely call `close` given all programs ever written. Yet, I think we already knew that.
450.
by kreetx 2y ago
The author also makes it sound like something has been taken away from them - one can rip it out if they really want to. It's just that most of us have our focuses elsewhere and have no need to tinker with systemd.

More ›