kreetx

14 ms·

271.
by kreetx 1y ago
The people who we are debating with seem to have the opinion that people from around the world have the right to assemble in the United States. That indeed is an interesting take.
272.
by kreetx 1y ago
Yes, but this person arrived from another country. Would you say freedom of speech and freedom of assembly means that people from around the world have the right to assemble in the United States ?
273.
by kreetx 1y ago
Yes, but isn't the current situation based on a technicality then? Assuming that reaching that when anyone reaches US law enforcement gets everything in the constitution applied to them and then must be let into the country because the
274.
by kreetx 1y ago
If you can't deny entry, isn't it a free-for-all?
275.
by kreetx 1y ago
So I guess the neat way for US to deny entry to people is somehow have the denying done by non-law-enforcement and also perhaps somehow outside of its soil (if that matters)?
276.
by kreetx 1y ago
I don't think few if any journalist I've read have taken part in protests. Also, most journalists just investigate and present stories by assembling what they found. And then they go and investigate another topic. But this person
277.
by kreetx 1y ago
This person continues to be able to speak freely. He also took part in the protests of Columbia University and by the looks of it wants to continue his political agenda in a foreign country . If this happened at scale then then foreigners
278.
by kreetx 1y ago
This person is from another country and is rather an activist than a journalist, and he also can continue to express his views to this day. Does it not make sense to you that a country (i.e, its citizens) don't actually want foreign
279.
by kreetx 1y ago
Does your right to hear anyone's speach mean that any person you want to hear and is able to reach the US has to be allowed to remain in the country? Does this mean physically hearing this person? Because if not, then the blog and the
280.
by kreetx 1y ago
I've no idea how he makes his money, and no, journalists are not "by definition" politically engaged. Secondly, df you read his blog, he pretty clearly is an activist, as he focuses on a single topic, has chosen a side, and a
281.
by kreetx 1y ago
So you are saying that anyone in the world has the rights listed in the US constitution?
282.
by kreetx 1y ago
So no upper limit: any amount of foreigners should be allowed in at any amount? (Corporal punishment is when it's physical pain. I don't think a sore bum from an airplane seat counts.)
283.
by kreetx 1y ago
Yes, but you are currently arguing because the person on your side of the argument. For me, the question is more of whether you should allow people enter the country who cause civil unrest. It doesn't sound reasonable to allow a free-f
284.
by kreetx 1y ago
And he can continue to express himself, or can't he?
285.
by kreetx 1y ago
He can still express his opinion and he can still protest. In your opinion, should anyone be able to travel to the US to protest? Would you set an upper limit to this process, or should any amount be allowed?
286.
by kreetx 1y ago
Sure, but with societal unrest don't you think there is a limit on how many foreigners you want in the country to be tilting the scales?
287.
by kreetx 1y ago
He is disturbing normal order.
288.
by kreetx 1y ago
The protesting and activism are the same. I think foreign students/citizens should refrain from doing either of these, as they are in the country for a specific reason (to study), and not to turn its government. You'll probably ge
289.
by kreetx 1y ago
Well, he appears to have been a protester at Columbia University in 2024, and he is also not a citizen. If you yourself are a citizen, I'm sure you can express your views and not be sent anywhere. You can also vote to get people in p
290.
by kreetx 1y ago
He also partook in protests in Columbia University last year, so in that sense he's a little more than person writing on the internet.
291.
by kreetx 1y ago
AFAIK, the speech is still free. The denied person seems to be a foreign national and by all looks of it, an activist, taking part in university protests. It doesn't seem all that surprising that he got denied entry.
292.
by kreetx 1y ago
I think with blogger the GP meant that he is not a professional journalist; an activist is somebody who is politically engaged, as clearly this person is. Does it appear to you that he is an actual journalist?
293.
by kreetx 1y ago
The company already "test[s] its vehicles on us" - what the parent was asking was that can you link any articles where Waymo actually was at fault?
294.
by kreetx 1y ago
Artificial sweeteners replace sugar (as you likely know), so there's a specific reason. But yes, eating any random newly invented molecul for no reason I wouldn't recommend either.
295.
by kreetx 1y ago
I initially reacted to the root comment with why these kinds of articles often receive dismissive comments. HN is mostly not a medical forum so a typical reader reader isn't going to want nor be able to discuss the technicalities - the
296.
by kreetx 1y ago
If the "tons of people" in the first paragraph were multiples more than the "some people" in the second paragraph, then I would agree that the solution is simple. But the thing you describe in the second paragraph is wha
297.
by kreetx 1y ago
Are any of them decisive?
298.
by kreetx 1y ago
Yup. If more calories were a "simple problem to solve", how come it isn't solved?
299.
by kreetx 1y ago
I think what commenters are looking for is a reason where this study is relevant for them (us) as humans, and they assess whether it is definitive or not. As HN is more of a generic curiosity and engineering related site then these startin
300.
by kreetx 1y ago
They either use the cookie for something other than a session, or they just want to be better safe than sorry. (Or for the sake of humour)

More ›