Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kredd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
You have more money to dick around with. More money means different types of opportunities, making it less boring. You can keep occupying yourselves with things other than having children. There’s still some sense of “I should have children
62.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Hm, you have a point. That being said, I’m not just a tiny minority who don’t have children. Well, also as a man without a partner, it’s not really easy. Super-majority of families have 2 or less kids (about 80% up here in Canada). So it’s
63.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Fair. In my head I consider “dicking around” a part of opportunity loss. Basically sacrificing whatever your definition of fun is with having children and the responsibilities that come with it.
64.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Only 17% of families up here in Canada have 3+ children. Yeah, that proposal will never fly. I wouldn’t even support it, because it doesn’t really make “having children” a benefit for currently living families.
65.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
They don’t always make sense or are reasonable to you. It’s a perfectly valid take, but a lot of people are genuinely living a fulfilled life without having any children. And again, so many young people right now have none or just one sibli
66.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Again, if every couple only had one child, we still would be having this issue, albeit slower. There’s no point in time we’ve had disproportionately high percentage older people either. Theoretically the issue might be resolved by itself, b
67.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
I agree about making children to be a net benefit for parents, but at the same time it’s hard to make it net benefit. It’s a biological problem - limited time window when you can have children and socially accepted (let’s randomly say 20-35
68.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
> The birth rate is negatively impacted by the economic situation Only to a certain extent. Looking at data of every single rich country, and my own circles, there’s just no appetite for most of people to have 3 children (2.1+ needed for
69.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
I'm in a similar boat as well, and most of the time I just make sure to take the new models for a test drive. Just trying to use them here and there as well, figuring out their capabilities and shortcomings. Makes it much easier to sme
70.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
It went down literally 3 minutes ago (I was in the middle of writing a PR comment), let's see if their cron job kicks in and reports the issue.
71.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Just did a mental test of this theory through past projects I’ve consulted for, and it seemed the opposite. I’ve seen hack jobs generating about $1M/day, as a second product of the company. And seen very mature serious applications bar
72.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
According to my friend, Tesla engineering didn't move to Texas, and he doesn't want to give up the California weather, so unlikely to make the move. If you have a routine, and enjoy year-long pretty nice weather, California will j
73.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Assuming due to Intel's stock debacle, there will be a significant spotlight on CHIPS subsidy receivers. I understand it takes a very long time to get things going for large manufacturing changes, but I'm curious how things are go
74.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
You get used to their quirks. I can more or less predict what Claude/GPT can do faster than me, so I exclusively use them for those scenarios. Implementing it to one's development routine isn't easy though, so I had to trial
75.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Yeah it is great, isn’t it? Someone told me there was an announcement from Meta how they’re deranking all political posts (maybe only on Threads?) and there was a lot of curfuffle that said stuff like “censorship”, but I genuinely believe i
76.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
My neighbourhood Facebook groups have gotten much more tolerable, if I’ll be honest. People stopped polluting them with provincial/federal news, and just talk about hyper local stuff, which I really like.
77.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
The difference is, sentiment to IBM’s performance is much different from investor’s perspective. They’re almost at all time highs in terms of stock prices as well. My understanding is Intel has to compete with Chinese chip manufacturers as
78.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Fair, you're right, apologies, I just have a knee-jerk reaction to any commentary that suggests religious indoctrination of children. But again, I still think parts of religious traditions are amazing (like bringing the community toget
79.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Tight knit irreligious communities always existed. I grew up in one, nobody in my family is/was religious, yet people still were close. I think the top comment nails down the root cause — rampant individualism is rewarded from an econo
80.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Good point. Everything boils down to moderation though, right? My usual attitude is, if I have nothing to do — say yes. If I already have plans, invite my friends, but still do it even if they decline. It’s just my simple way of signalling
81.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
The problem is Intel will be judged against the speed of SMIC and other companies, which grows much faster. I understand it’s a completely different game in China, and they have a bigger government backing, but unfortunately 3.5 years is a
82.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
One thing I really don’t get, is what do people under the age of 16 (can’t drive yet) and over the age of 75 (get a bit too old to drive) do when they wanna just hang out? Ok, well, I know what they do, but how are people ok with being trap
83.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
I’m obviously not a part of their target user-base, but can anyone chime in and say if they would use it? I would genuinely be interested in reading a short explanation or an interview with a person who would find it engaging, other than mi
84.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=361004... “Real estate and rental and leasing” for my province. Construction is separate. It is at 18%+ here, so I just rolled it down to 10 for the count
85.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
I’m a renter, and I would love that. That being said, majority of people in North America own their homes. Since looking at your property as an investment has been normalized, those voters wouldn’t really like that. Something similar is hap
86.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Not sure how it's down there, but my understanding is even if we have housing crisis, legislations that would actually bring down the housing prices is also bad for us. RE market is about 10%+ of the entire GDP, so we want individuals
87.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Fair enough. Unless I misunderstood your point it sounds like, what you guys have right now is good for people and their lives. Isn't that the entire point of life? I can see why general population might support it, while us techies wo
88.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
I might be talking out of my depth, as I don’t live in Europe, but I’ve heard the same paraphrased headlines like these since at least 2016. Has status quo been swayed one way or another since then? Theoretically speaking, wouldn’t legislat
89.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
Participation in large scale societal interaction requires some trust. Throughout the history, we've slowly decided to compromise by giving up on privacy and increasing that trust in specific circumstances. You can argue whether post-9
90.
▲
by
kredd
2y ago
People really pay attention to that in 2024? I feel young!
More ›