krainboltgreene

8 ms·

61.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
> Oh how's moderating and legislating social media behemots going so far? This feels like you intended to make it a gotcha question, but the answer is: America isn't really trying to do that at all. So we should just give up? &
62.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
> It seems rationale to believe that humans can construct an entertainment mechanism so addictive as to warrant safeguards. Okay but the conversation isn't "Should we have safeguards" it's "How do we handle the p
63.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
This kind of legislation is frankly just bad. Any TV station in america could have broadcasted the worst things in the world to thousands of people affecting their lives together. You know how we handled that? Legislation on the broadcaster
64.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
IMHO this is an education problem.
65.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
> is just as copyright protected as the art is. This is lost on a lot of people, thats' why there's a special phrase every FOSS person knows by heart.
66.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
> My take on this is that we as a society are now on the verge of transitioning towards programming as an art form. It already was. This just makes it a subscription service.
67.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
> on reasonably priced hardware. Thank goodness this isn't in a problem!
68.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
Is it serious pain? Lasting a very specific amount of time? In one side of your face only? From zero to 10 pretty quickly?
69.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
I'm confused, do you not know what "we" means?
70.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
Here's a convincing argument: Pay me for some of my labor or you stop getting labor at all.
71.
by krainboltgreene 9mo ago
Everyone suggests UBI like this sort of thing is a massive hurricane and we just gotta take it on the chin. Nah man, this stuff isn't happening anywhere else. We can simply say "No, you don't get to ruin the economy for your
72.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
It’s so cool to see this kind of effort while the leadership of the field is openly questioning why there isn’t any economic impact from said field.
73.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
I didn't imply that it was, BigTTYGothGF.
74.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
> With A.I./ML and high def aerial and street video + other electronic signals you don’t need stop and frisk. Imagine believing that this stuff is effective.
75.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
You are just a cluster of atoms, are you any different than a volcano?
76.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Man, what are we supposed to do with people who think the above?
77.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
> It's some poor miserable soul sitting at that checkout line 9-to-5 brainlessly scanning products, that's their whole existence. You're right, they should unionize for better working conditions.
78.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
When have you ever seen this thought process work on someone? "Wow, you're right, I use programs that make decisions and that means I can't be mad about companies who make LLMs." Surely a 100% failure rate would change y
79.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
God I wish it didn't.
80.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Come on man, I think it's safe to say a tradition that favor's men over women is reasonably sexist, especially given the time the tradition established women were property. I don't think Belgium's feelings will get hurt,
81.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
All land in China is state owned, what in the world are you talking about? I can't tell if you don't know about China's state-capitalism or if you're trying to do purity politics about economic governance. Literally no o
82.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Engels is the one who wrote about it, not Marx, which you'd know if you knew what communism means. While Marx agreed with Engels words, he doesn't explicitly talk about it: > State interference in social relations becomes, in o
83.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Literally no expert believes the USSR fell because of economic central planning. It is truly absurd to look at a 60 historic industrialization and urbanization and see "failure" in the long term. > China still doesn't exer
84.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Where are you getting this data? Does it include the USSR and China? I bet it does.
85.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
> Economic central planning is a fool's errand. crazy, because the two biggest cases of economic central planning are the USSR which grew faster than any civilization ever (a literacy rate of 30% to 100% in 60 years) and China who i
86.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
> For the communist model to work, the state has to own everything. At first I used co-op's because I just assumed you meant democratically controlled companies rather than "communism" and now I know you don't know wh
87.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Yeah man I don't think co-op fisheries are the problem here.
88.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
I don't like tptacek, but it's insane to not back up this comment with any amount of evidence or at least explanation. The guy knows his shit.
89.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
That is because police are class traitors. They serve the bourgeoisie. That's also why police unions are allowed to be insanely powerful.
90.
by krainboltgreene 10mo ago
Unions would actually prevent this problem, because in response to a wrongful firing they can apply collective pressure. That's not why Americans don't want to join a union.

More ›