krackers

24 ms·

481.
by krackers 9mo ago
I guess another thing, is that the null hypothesis is that an incorrect image is equally likely to be matched to any of the 10 decoy targets. But this isn't the case, the LLM has its own implicit bias. For instance, if you modeled thin
482.
by krackers 9mo ago
Apparently you don't need a license to carry swords in California, which is surprising. Maybe Ken-Sama was onto something.
483.
by krackers 9mo ago
Hm I did notice this bit "list of up to the last 50 targets you've done (so you don't get duplicate targets too frequently)" which seems to invalidate some of the methodology. If the target is never among the last 50 you
484.
by krackers 9mo ago
Before you can define statistical significance, you have to clearly define the success criteria. From what I see, remote viewing produces vague results, so some amount of human interpretation is necessarily. What counts as a "hit"
485.
by krackers 10mo ago
That social-rv is really interesting, apparently the target is randomly assigned _after_ submission, so it's not just remote viewing but also precognition? The popular ones on the "explore sessions" are a very close match, bu
486.
by krackers 10mo ago
I'm surprised too, considering that in https://x.com/karpathy/status/1977758204139331904 he mentioned regarding his NanoChat repo >Good question, it's basically entirely hand-written (with tab autocom
487.
by krackers 10mo ago
That's a matter of tone mapping which is separate from gamma encoding? Even today, linearized pixel value 255 will be displayed at your defined SDR brightness no matter what. Changing your encoding gamma won't help that because fo
488.
by krackers 10mo ago
>Human light intensity perception is not linear... You have to nonlinearize at some point of the pipeline Why exactly? My understanding is that gamma correction is effectively a optimization scheme during encoding to allocate bits in a p
489.
by krackers 10mo ago
>if the linear data is displayed directly, it will appear much darker then it should be. This seems more a limitation of monitors. If you had very large bit depth, couldn't you just display images in linear light without gamma corre
490.
by krackers 10mo ago
Their supply chain prowess likely means they have already secured contracts for 2026 (and maybe even 2027), so they will not be affected by the price hike. But maybe they'll still use it as an opportunity to bump prices and rake in fre
491.
by krackers 10mo ago
Mocks make it easy to record and assert on method invocations. Additionally spys (instance mocks) are really useful when you need to forward to the real method or rely on some state. At the moment I can't see anything Mokckito gives th
492.
by krackers 10mo ago
>Mockito 5 shipped a breaking change where its main artifact is now an agent. That's because starting JVM 22, the previous so-called "dynamic attachment of agents" is put behind a flag Wouldn't this hold back enterpri
493.
by krackers 10mo ago
Isn't this the lytro camera?
494.
by krackers 10mo ago
Seems like a more advanced version of zalgotext (which also uses combining marks)
495.
by krackers 10mo ago
Apple was using a novel butterfly keyboard mechanism instead of standard scissor switches during that era. The M1+ MBPs went back to scissor switches.
496.
by krackers 10mo ago
Can you write a short review comparing to the sculpt in terms of shape and tactile feel? The mwave seems to have a more pronounced bump just eyeballing it. And as someone who is comfortable with scissor switches, whether on a laptop or MS s
497.
by krackers 10mo ago
You'll be happy to know that the InCase Sculpt is being sold again, if you can buy one before they sell out. They're nearly identical to the old MS Sculpt, down to the obscure bug with the keyboard matrix. The only difference that
498.
by krackers 10mo ago
I think Matias is sort of notorious for stuff that looks good in theory, but is plagued by reliability issues they just can't seem to sort out. I didn't know it was possible to mess up a scissor switch keyboard, but apparently Mat
499.
by krackers 10mo ago
You should release it, it'd be quite useful.
500.
by krackers 10mo ago
Along with the recent results on HRM/TRM, it seems like you can squeeze a lot more juice out of LLMs just by having some sort of iterative refinement? I can buy that it works, but seems like the agent harness needs to be specific to th
501.
by krackers 10mo ago
Actually in JS array indexing is same as property indexing right? So it's actually looking up the string '0', as in arr['0']
502.
by krackers 10mo ago
> extra attention head were added that queried the KV data from lower layers Isn't this sort of similar to latent looping? E.g. [1]. But actually as [2] argues, even that wasn't a good experiment because it used the very last h
503.
by krackers 10mo ago
I think there are two key differences though: 1) Attention doesn't doesn't use fixed distance-dependent weight for the aggregation but instead the weight becomes "semantically-dependent", based on association between q&#
504.
by krackers 10mo ago
>think they are training for the spatial part of the tests I'm not sure the party that "they" is referring to here, since arc-agi-3 dataset isn't released yet and labs probably have not begun targeting it. For arc-agi
505.
by krackers 10mo ago
Even before AI, I think I've seen it used before in self-help books or therapy type stuff. It has always felt like an intellectually lazy attempt at reframing, painting things as black and white in the form of a thought-terminating cli
506.
by krackers 10mo ago
Arc-Agi 3 is coming soon, I'm very excited for that because it's a true test of multimodality, spatial reasoning, and goal planning. I think there was some preliminary post somewhere that did show that current models basically try
507.
by krackers 10mo ago
http://www.codersnotes.com/notes/a-constructive-look-at-temp...
508.
by krackers 10mo ago
I remember this used to be www.wwwdotcom.com but it seems the internet lasted longer than that page did.
509.
by krackers 10mo ago
There is at least one turing complete programming language that is trivially context-free, Brainfuck, so at least for the purposes of expressivity it seems OK to consider context-free ones.
510.
by krackers 10mo ago
> you can execute arbitrary programs with your PC represented as an FSM You cannot execute arbitrary programs with your PC, your PC is limited in how much memory and storage it has access to. >Your computer is strictly more computatio

More ›