kordless

25 ms·

241.
Elastic Progress(tympanus.net)
2 points by kordless 10y ago|0 comments
242.
by kordless 10y ago
By the argument it's really easy to blow time, shouldn't there be a way to see if the time was useful to the person donating the time?
243.
by kordless 10y ago
Analogies are comparisons of two things, usually for clarification. A clock uses comparative based mechanics to keep time. On the other hand, these scientists are claiming their opinion is a "factual" event that can be compared
244.
by kordless 10y ago
Actually, those types of questions are called leading questions . Making a point based on a hypothetical can not be logically used to make a factual point without it being a bias, even if you phrase it as an "unknown", or questio
245.
by kordless 10y ago
Not every model is sustainable and a great operating team may only be able to forestall the inevitable with some models. It's a duplicitous statement for @rus to speak for others in the sale of their company.
246.
by kordless 10y ago
It's disingenuous to call this a "clock", given clocks keep their own time through a rigorous standard of counting the passage of precisely measured causality. While we may be "closer" to doom by some arbitrary con
247.
by kordless 10y ago
This reminds me of what Alan Watts calls "prickly goo" or "gooey prickles".
248.
by kordless 10y ago
You argument is biased and non-factual. Default ssh measures keep un-trusted entities from gaining access, normally. Conversely, once access is granted by the admin to trusted entities, the normal UNIX permissions continue to provide means
249.
by kordless 10y ago
Anti-pickler.
250.
by kordless 10y ago
A simple way of knowing something is biased is by analyzing the content of the intent. For example: > If President Trump tries to turn public institutions against the people they are intended to protect and serve, then leaking will be mo
251.
by kordless 10y ago
Yesterday, I watched Bruno Vassel fly his glider in the Rocky Mountains for nearly 2 hours on Youtube. I hypothesize someday we will be able to extract energy from the Ether to power our own spaceships in a similar way to gliding. That&#x27
252.
by kordless 10y ago
There's a Docker repo which you may find useful: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs#docker-usage
253.
by kordless 10y ago
Client support is not "real progress" contrary to popular adoption views. Neither are standards, now I think about it.
254.
by kordless 10y ago
This looks pretty slick. There's a well done explanation of the architecture process in the blog.
255.
by kordless 10y ago
That is an unanswerable question, given the current lack of data.
256.
by kordless 10y ago
"China" is an aggregate of consensus and cannot act "alone" as an irrational actor. If they colluded to change a transaction, there would be a net split and everyone would know. Again, I'm standing by the cost analy
257.
by kordless 10y ago
Yes, I agree. That part of him is his image in the public. It is both him and us at the same time, if you think about it from one perspective.
258.
by kordless 10y ago
Which means Assange knew it was a double bind when he said what he said. They never tried to extradite him, even if it was implied. This now means that everyone expects the US to extradite him, which is what they were trying to avoid to beg
259.
by kordless 10y ago
> don't you think it's a tad sleazy to use these people's videos without at least letting us click-through to their YouTube channel? There is no way to answer this question, which means it's intended to blame. This si
260.
by kordless 10y ago
> I dare say that majority of the 7 billion of us who are alive now would be dead. No jokes. Dead. This is an illogical statement which rationalizes utilizing technology and capitalism to achieve greater numbers of instances of people. I
261.
How an Allegedly Fake Video Killed a Much-Hyped Drone Startup(forbes.com)
4 points by kordless 10y ago|0 comments
262.
by kordless 10y ago
Name calling results in reassigning fear. People are afraid of the unknown and so try to box it up in something digestible they can fear less. We tend to blame others because it's easy and cheap to do so. If you are wrong, that means I
263.
by kordless 10y ago
It's shared physical space. I'm OK if they video me. I'm OK if they share that video with law enforcement if there is a reason of substance to do so and as long as they make it publicly known they asked for it within a reason
264.
by kordless 10y ago
I'm not stuck on semantics, so that's the truth of the matter, whether you attempt to rationalize I am or not. Make no mistake that semantics are always important. Without the English language, neither you or I could communicate c
265.
by kordless 10y ago
There is no logical way to verify that all activists (or even a majority of them) use Signal over WhatsApp. The perception that activists use Signal may have been enough to block them, but having a huge backdoor in WhatsApp is reason enou
266.
by kordless 10y ago
> Please don't get stuck on semantics. That's a blaming statement used to indicate someone is being pedantic, which can then be used to "prove" them wrong by the followup. All of your counter examples are based on the
267.
by kordless 10y ago
> > As long as the cost of changing the blockchain is higher than the return on changing it, the chain remains immutable > I'm sorry, but that is not a logically correct statement I'd love to see a logical argument presen
268.
by kordless 10y ago
Give the cepheid a laser and let him work it out himself.
269.
by kordless 10y ago
> Agreed; very little is truly absolutely immutable Dissonance leads to conflicted statements. Parsing conflicted statements often leads to dissonance. Tread carefully. The only absolute truth is that I exist. That fact, while I'm o
270.
by kordless 10y ago
> They’re Software-as-a-Service on steroids. I've been writing about this for a while and I'm thankful someone else "gets it" on a level. The key to understanding why blockchain data structures are a big deal for soft

More ›