A simple way of knowing something is biased is by analyzing the content of the intent. For example: > If President Trump tries to turn public institutions agai

A simple way of knowing something is biased is by analyzing the content of the intent. For example: > If President Trump tries to turn public institutions against the people they are intended to protect and serve, then leaking will be more important than ever. This is a conflicted statement. Whistle blowing, or leaking if you must, is always important and should not be weighed on a single individual's threat to the people. It is always important to report a biased judgement against others, but the importance should not be indicated in the same breath as stating "if" someone does something it's "more" important. This "twist" in conflicted logic in the statement makes it a blaming statement against Trump, which might indicate it's biased. That's not to say Trump isn't biased, but that's another problem entirely.