kordless

15 ms·

91.
by kordless 10y ago
I'm not trying to rationalize anyone's actions here, but if the captain told you to kill another passenger, that is not within his right of removal of choice for individual. i.e. The captain is only allowed to remove choice for an
92.
by kordless 10y ago
I think you are in a better position to answer your own question than anyone, given it's a leading question. I would rephrase that it's not "kind" or "unkind" but actually blaming to a) be offended for a grou
93.
by kordless 10y ago
> Deliberately suspending one's beliefs takes very good storytelling and/or resources corresponding to a movie budget I think the "cost" entirely depends on the frame in which the truth is held. It is my belief/h
94.
by kordless 10y ago
What I, personally, see as customer irrationality cannot be spoken for by you, without a large amount of irrationality occurring in your own frame. It is simply impossible to know what me, or the fictitious irrational customer, is thinking,
95.
by kordless 10y ago
Representing irrational actors is hard. :)
96.
by kordless 10y ago
> you need to deal with them civilly regardless if you feel insulted I strongly disagree with the assertion all customers can be dealt with "civilly" while still remaining sane. Customer irrationality is widely varied, and some
97.
by kordless 10y ago
We chose not to define what value means in practical terms, with Internet infrastructure. That is to say, we allow unlimited access to compute resources using conditionals, which themselves may or may not be valuable, or secure. By turnin
98.
by kordless 10y ago
Wisdom | Cryptocurrency Applied to APIs | Moraga, CA | REMOTE/ONSITE | Founder Wisdom is a project-in-progress I have been working on for a few years which applies cryptopayments to API method calls to implement the 402 Payment Requir
99.
by kordless 10y ago
Transparency is a relative term, and full transparency is an illusion, at best. I suggest companies don't use transparency as a core value because of this assertion.
100.
by kordless 10y ago
This is simply thinking about thinking, which is allowed (at least in Zen) as long as one doesn't think about thinking about thinking. In other words, holding irrational beliefs and spreading those beliefs in a viral way, either in the
101.
by kordless 10y ago
A "protocol" is just a good excuse to create a consciousness entity, which itself is designed to interpret the communication between two other entities.
102.
by kordless 10y ago
I think the point may include the fact a chemical plant and a water plant are not that much different in comparison to something which is would appear to be a radical shift in approach. It is my opinion that this will be the function AI ser
103.
by kordless 10y ago
> becoming a specific point where everyone burns up and dies Some of us seek this in the attainment of Nirvana.
104.
by kordless 10y ago
Please visualize and define various malicious activity.
105.
by kordless 10y ago
Not the "if you are willing to be manipulative" statement. That is what defines a troll. A "troll" is simply an entity (of race human) who is willing to remove choice from others by tricking them into removing choice for
106.
by kordless 10y ago
It's what I call rational irrationality. ;)
107.
by kordless 10y ago
Visualize other's truths at the expense of your own.
108.
by kordless 10y ago
Be spontaneous, is the quick and dirty example. ;) It's hard to have intent to be spontaneous, given it's the inverse of intent. Other examples of internally held double-binds would be jobs, or relationships. Holding a job you do
109.
by kordless 10y ago
It is an irrational belief that trolls have infinite time and energy. This is, in fact, the very idea of irrationality, who's concept indicates additional work must be done to determine outcome of choice, either by individual or by gro
110.
by kordless 10y ago
I'm from the camp the singularity already happened! ;)
111.
by kordless 10y ago
Second thought kills, so I killed second thought. ;)
112.
Million Container Challenge(hashicorp.com)
1 points by kordless 10y ago|0 comments
113.
by kordless 10y ago
We're now 5 replies deep into a comment by someone that shows historical & purposeful pedantry. I would state that, in previous times, this type of comment thread would be killed fairly quickly given what you name something really
114.
Elon Musk Is Wrong. We Aren't Living in a Simulation(motherboard.vice.com)
7 points by kordless 10y ago|1 comments
115.
Malignant Computation(radar.oreilly.com)
1 points by kordless 10y ago|0 comments
116.
by kordless 10y ago
Look at a thing in your mind's eye, if you are capable of doing so. An apple or a book will serve for this example. The pixels you are "seeing" allow you to distinguish the thing you are looking at as an individual object. (T
117.
by kordless 10y ago
I have a homeless friend who lives in a van. He's in the Bay. He cleans around where he lives, keeping the area tidy. I'm sure he'd love to know more about stuff like this.
118.
by kordless 10y ago
I would propose two counter conjectures: 1. There is no you. 2. There is no time.
119.
by kordless 10y ago
> I do think that the top 1% have gotten so skilled at trapping wealth and therefore opportunity that it's really screwing over everyone else. This is well put and I would only add that the wealth trapping is occurring in a viral w
120.
by kordless 10y ago
If I got paid a revenue split whenever someone paid to get public data that involved me, I'd be OK with it.

More ›