kopol

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kopol 5y ago

   There's no evidence that anyone here was invoking a blood libel. That would require anti-semitic intent on the part of the speaker, of which none has been demonstrated.
2. 2.▲
   by kopol 5y ago

   No it's not.
3. 3.▲
   by kopol 5y ago

   It was a finger-wagging, needlessly deflecting type of 'education' that had no real relevance to the actual topic at hand. No-one was discussing his monstrous behavior in terms of his Jewishness.
4. 4.▲
   by kopol 5y ago

   It is entirely irrelevant that he is Jewish. No-one was discussing this or even vaguely alluded to it.
5. 5.▲
   by kopol 5y ago

   Please don't baselessly accuse people of anti-semitism. That anti-semites have referenced drinking the blood of children, does not mean that anyone else who says similar is being anti-semitic. Kissinger being Jewish is not the issue he