koollx

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by koollx 10y ago

   Sikuli is simple but from what I know about it you can't write maintainable tests with it. Relying on the pictures to be always the same and driving your test is guaranteed to cause false positives. I think the future lies with platfor
2. 2.▲
   by koollx 10y ago

   Screenster support for timeouts is much more extensive. It automatically determines the time it takes for the server to process each user action, it uses the visual baseline to wait for the right state instead of timing out or waiting too l
3. 3.▲
   by koollx 10y ago

   I think "doing more harm than good" came from a different post... I don't see anything wrong with comparing an open source and commercial product. We'd still be using IRC if Slack didn't come around. Time is not f
4. 4.▲
   by koollx 10y ago

   Screenster like a lot of other tools gives the user an ability to send a mouse over explicitly during the recorder. In the modern web pages that have to work well with touchscreens mouse over in general is de-emphasized anyway.