konstantinua00

9 ms·

1.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
...what are you talking about? array-like storage with dynamic size has existed since forever - it's vector. over or undercommitting is a solved problem VLA is the way to bring that into type system, so that it can be it's own var
2.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
no, correct analogy would be vendor: "we present 100% electric car" we: "that's cool, I always wanted to decrease petrol use. But... can you provide an option for some petrol use? It's called hybrid, iirc?" ven
3.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
there are smaller security options
4.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
one thing I never understood about VLAs - discussion about them always hits a "can't put it on stack safely" and gets halted, forever why not to make it heap-only type? it seems such a useful addition to type system, why igno
5.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
> The other devices don't meet the criteria you got it wrong way around the CONSUMER criteria is "we want better independent security ON DEVICES WE ALREADY OWN" complaints like in this thread are symptoms of unfullfilled d
6.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
4-5 versions of the same phone in the gigantic sea of possible devices
7.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
iirc, some kubernetes library under BSD microsoft spent a lot of time asking questions to the author - and then rolled out Azure copy of the lib author went public "how dare they use me like that" - but he did make it BSD himself,
8.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
aka that's what read-only is for write?
9.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
I prefer to never use it C and C++ are about types before names - and modifying that is simply a change for the sake of a change, needless and useless. There's a lot of education enertia behind it - and effort should be spent on fighti
10.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
can't it be solved by negative traits? isn't the problem that rw is still r, so passes checks for both? can't you make one rw and the other r(-w)?
11.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
using BSD/MIT licences is like betting against black swan event sure, "contributing is cheaper than maintaining a fork" is true most of the time - but the moment new Microsoft comes in with "embrace, extend, extinguish&q
12.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
why would latency matter if the trading we're talking about isn't high-speed?
13.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
how many times things evolved into sharks? ichtiozaur, dolphin/orca anything else?
14.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
there is no true value, so it's not accuracy it's precision
15.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
that's the argument, yes no net force, but net potential energy - thus gravitational dilation
16.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
yeah, my first thought was "can we not bring bad omen with the word interloper into this?"
17.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
this isn't UB, and any other language can do this optimization as well even the one you cult over
18.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
what does YC mean here? Y combinator?
19.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
9/12 3 months have passed, 9 to go :)
20.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
"common" has such a large spread because meaning behind it is sort of "at least one in each sample", where that sample can be anything (graspable) if you're a teacher and one student per class does the same thing -
21.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
can't zoom in on mobile :/
22.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
so the website processes only comments older than 2023? not very useful for more newer users like me :/
23.
by konstantinua00 1y ago
Forbidden You don't have permission to access this resource. thanks for being open ...I guess
24.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
so if every star smokes a cigarette, there will be roughly 1 mol (6.02e23) of said particles?
25.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
how is it different from the "sidewalk" algo in the article? you'd get the same pitfall of torus topology with 2 perpendicular loops
26.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
it is interested in both
27.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
how does it work on DAG? I always thought it's a linked list algo
28.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
why was it kept secret?
29.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
what does MID do?
30.
by konstantinua00 2y ago
speaking of speaking past each other > and then replace one of the subsequent 200 lbs/second inputs with 199.99999999 lbs/second > replace one indeed not the last one, but no, not "all"

More ›