koe123

8 ms·

121.
by koe123 2y ago
Also Denmark I believe
122.
by koe123 2y ago
For such an approach I’ve always thought it seemed a risk to launch something like that into the air. E.g. what happens if the rocket explodes while taking off? Or something bad happens when in space? Will it rain nuclear material?
123.
by koe123 2y ago
Which is a great idea if we ignore all other issues in academia, e.g. pressure to publish etc. Taking such a hard-line stance I fear will just yield much less science being done.
124.
by koe123 2y ago
Puppy linux was my first linux install back when I was around 13 years old, and I remember it fondly. I recall I even found it easier to get up and running than ubuntu. (Which is somewhat puzzling in hindsight?)
125.
by koe123 2y ago
Is my understanding correct that this would provide version agnostic python bindings? Currently, I am building a version of my bindings separately for each version (e.g. building and linking with python 3.7, 3.8, etc.). While automated, it
126.
by koe123 2y ago
I feel as though people are concerned over a hypothetical. Can anyone show me AI generated content that has fully replaced the alternative? If this does exist, what exactly is the value that was lost if the “real” thing was so easily replac
127.
by koe123 2y ago
The fact that hallucinates doesn’t make it useless for everything, but it does limit its scope. Respectfully, I think you haven’t applied it to the right problems if this is your perspective. In some ways, its like saying the internet is us
128.
by koe123 2y ago
I second this, it would help to justify the time investment into a framework if its clear how it stacks up!
129.
by koe123 2y ago
I completely agree. To me the discussion here reads a little like: “Hah. See? It cant do everything!”. It makes me wonder if the goal is to convince each other that: yes, indeed, humans are not yet replaced. It’s next token regression, of c
130.
by koe123 2y ago
I’m not sure I understand. Its not required, as is evidenced by all the amazing indie games we have already pre AI. But if it helps, why not? Maybe this way there can be even more great games.
131.
by koe123 2y ago
Its not always the right tool depending on the task. IMO using LLMs is also a skill, much like learning how to Google stuff. E.g. apparently C# generics isn’t something its good at. Interesting, so don’t use it for that, apparently its the
132.
by koe123 2y ago
I don’t quite understand your last point. Why not use generative AI? I think it could really empower indie devs for instance.
133.
by koe123 2y ago
Possibly naive but I very much view CUDA and its integration into ML frameworks being nvidias moat
134.
by koe123 2y ago
Typically I'm considering embedded applications (armv8, armv7)
135.
by koe123 2y ago
One could then argue all transactional relationships are predatory then, right? A restaurant serves you only for pay. You could argue cynically that all relationships are to some extent transactional. People “invest” in friendships after al
136.
by koe123 2y ago
On the other hand, Anthropic founders reason for leaving also yielded them angle to start a new successful company, now worth 9+ figures. Given that I’m not sure I’ll take their concerns about the state of OpenAI at face value.
137.
by koe123 2y ago
Probably should have specified that! I’m referring to cpu inference.
138.
by koe123 2y ago
Perhaps somewhat off topic, does anyone know how stuff like ggml compares to runtimes (tensorflow lite, onnxruntime, etc.)?
139.
by koe123 3y ago
Interesting, I suppose what you're proposing is that models could, in some abstract way, extrapolate research results taking ideas A and B that it "knows" from its training, and using them to create idea AB. Then, we assert t
140.
by koe123 3y ago
> I guess people working there believe in magic. I've been thinking about this recently. Personally, I've yet to see any compelling evidence that an LLM, let alone any AI, can operate really well "out of distribution"
141.
by koe123 3y ago
On the other hand, can we conclusively say that humans aren’t really advanced biological stochastic parrots?
142.
by koe123 3y ago
Probably being super naive, but stuff like that always makes me wonder, is there something special about human consciousness, even? Perhaps it's just a sliding scale and we're just seemingly ahead of other specifies. We assert tha