Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
knorker
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
151.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
The difference in performance in the kind of compute workloads I'm interested in are so improved by SIMD/Vector that there isn't even any point evaluating non-RVV hardware.
152.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
Well the Huawei winning scandal appeared to be real. But also, I wouldn't be surprised. In any case, as I said I have actual expertise in this area, and exactly none of being 20-50 years late has any technical reasons. I'm not sur
153.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
Oh, no vector extension. Probably a dealbreaker for me.
154.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
It makes me sick to see London bragging about this. This is last century technology, and other cities managed to retrofit this just fine, including of course using leaky cable in the tunnels. That it took 20-30 years longer than everyone el
155.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
What are the legalities of having a cash balance, withdrawable? (So not "credits" or something) Do you need a banking license, or partner with someone who has?
156.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
No in this case addressing the accusation is necessary. I think what's currently been said is sufficient. You need to make a grown up version of the statement "None of that is true", but yes probably best to leave it at that.
157.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
What do you mean by "move or copy constructor is used when constructing the parameter of foo"? Nothing is constructed at call time. Check out this example, which compiles just fine, even though Foo is neither copy nor move constru
158.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
p in the callee is not constructed at all. It's a reference. > Calling a function that takes a rref will never use a move constructor to create the paramete This is what I mean by talking past each other. This is literally what I sa
159.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
When talking C++ move semantics it's easy to talk past each other. So I'm not sure what your claim is. Another commenter said that one can tell if something is moved or not without looking at the body of the callee. Is that what y
160.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
The call to a move cons/move assign does not happen at call time. When a function taking rvalue reference is called, it can still have two code paths, one that copies the argument, and one that moves it. All the && does is prev
161.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
You should not be downvoted, which you appear to be. Your comparison is both correct and interesting. Maybe you're being too verbose for your point, and it would help readers if you summarize and narrow the argument to: In Rust a funct
162.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
No: https://godbolt.org/z/d7f6MWcb5 Look, the act of calling std::move and and calling a function taking an rvalue reference in no way invokes a move constructor or move assignment. It does not "move". It
163.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
Ok, fair enough. So you're saying if you use the language to write UB, then you get UB? Seems kinda circular. Ok, you're not the same user who said it can be UB. But what does it then mean to same "sometimes it's UB"
164.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
After moving a value, it needs to remain in a "valid but unspecified state". How do you mean accessing a valid object is UB?
165.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
Not sure why that's relevant. But if that's interesting then it's probably also relevant that it's an open marriage. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-13439603/eric-...
166.
▲
by
knorker
9mo ago
Every second spent arguing this point, or spent saying the words "X, formerly twitter", is free advertising for a multi billion corporation. Why are you wasting syllables giving it free advertising? It was a sewage when named twit
167.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
> I should've qualified that as address exhaustion on the Internet Well I addressed that too, so… > private networking To some extent this is a distinction without a difference. Again, as I said… > we would probably be having
168.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
> It failed to solve the problem of impending IP address depletion I wouldn't say so. Some mobile carriers and big data centers have used IPv6 to pretty much completely solve the problem of being able to assign a unique address to d
169.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
For Google connecting clients it's only half the internet. Half. The. Internet. What a failure. /s
170.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
171.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
By making the exposition unintelligible, I guess he's illustrating how complicated time travel makes a story. Except Primer did that without this crutch.
172.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
> You seem to be confused on that point Please stop repeatedly misrepresenting what I said. This is not reddit. I have repeatedly said that this is about the interpolation, and that I'm NOT judging things actually filmed at higher f
173.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
> There is no such thing as the soap opera effect. What has been asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I'll take the Pepsi challenge on this any day. It looks horrible. > Good quality sets and makeup and ca
174.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
If you think this is about snobbery, then I'm afraid you've completely misunderstood the problem. This is more comparable to color being turned off. Sure, if you're completely colorblind, then it's not an issue. But non-
175.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
To me it's not about art. It's about this setting making the production quality of a billion dollar movie look like a cardboard SNL set. When walking past a high end TV I've honestly confused a billion dollar movie for a teen
176.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
> Duffer’s advice highlights a conflict between technological advances and creators' goals I wouldn't call it a "technological advance" to make even the biggest blockbuster look like it was filmed with a 90s camcorder
177.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
Not never. Woz championed some of that in the 1970s. It's before my time, but the Apple II was pretty open as I understand it.
178.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
Apple has not been nice and open since the 1970s. The only open and nice person in any important role is Wozniak.
179.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
Is this some snarky reddit comment? Yeah, there are literally billions of people in the world who don't speak English. And yet HN is de facto English. Do you see many people commenting on HN in French? How's that working out for t
180.
▲
by
knorker
10mo ago
I'm not sure what you are attempting to add by being pedantic while not affecting the conclusion in any what whatsoever.
More ›