knorker

35 ms·

511.
by knorker 3y ago
My comment was more in general, that people who are aware of both, and read carefully, will spot the distinction by capitalizing it unambigiously. They (and I) may need to do a double-take if they process it wrong, and you reduce that risk
512.
by knorker 3y ago
> They are those that disable HTTP. Who's disabling HTTP? > Like it was not enough to make HTTPS default, they need to eradicate the opposition. I think you need to elaborate your world view by many paragraphs before I can unders
513.
by knorker 3y ago
If you write it "LORA" then people won't know if you mean "LoRA" or "LoRa". Microsoft already created this huge confusion, so I'd recommend you help not make it worse by using the relevant capitalizat
514.
by knorker 3y ago
Who is "they"? Is there some kind of evil back room conspiracy to make the web faster, using open standards?
515.
by knorker 3y ago
How small a server setup do you mean? This was apparently 20k machines: https://blog.cloudflare.com/zero-day-rapid-reset-http2-recor... Most web services don't need clever protocol attacks to be downed by 20k machines.
516.
by knorker 3y ago
Cloudflare explicitly says it's an unknown threat actor: https://blog.cloudflare.com/zero-day-rapid-reset-http2-recor...
517.
by knorker 3y ago
Note to self: I'm not actually a god.
518.
by knorker 3y ago
In addition to the other reply you got from someone else: I'm not saying they'll necessarily be great people. But people do change. Especially the understanding of consequences is not fully developed in your early 20s. So even if
519.
by knorker 3y ago
I agree that we have no need for vengance against the criminal. But the fact that SBF would do it again is not a case for vengance/punishment, but for deterrence. And, frankly, it's harder to launch your next scam while you'r
520.
by knorker 3y ago
But then it's not punishment for punishment's sake, but for deterrence's sake. I read the comment as talking about retribution, to make the victim feel good, not about deterrence. Are you saying you have data to show that 20
521.
by knorker 3y ago
Punishment, deterrence for others, and deterrence for the individual themselves, are three important parts of why the state has consequences for bad deeds. The US is pretty punishment-heavy. As a non-US person it even looks sadistic. It&#x2
522.
by knorker 3y ago
Yeah, the problem with that kind of thing is that GC languages disincentivizes thinking about ownerships, and tacking ownership on after the fact is basically a rewrite.
523.
by knorker 3y ago
While I don't have much experience with C#, and I agree that Java is the worst, this at least applies to Go as well. Though to a lesser degree.
524.
by knorker 3y ago
It makes some things easier, and some things harder, or more complex. So I can deny that most development becomes easier with GC. At least if you also intend to actually run the thing. Running Java means forever fighting the GC, needing to
525.
by knorker 3y ago
Retroactive to devices released in 2021.
526.
by knorker 3y ago
Same reason you can write a proof of concept in a weekend, but the production version can take years. The web's best example is twitter. Anyone can write a twitter clone in a weekend. A reasonably competent programmer can create a mult
527.
by knorker 3y ago
Pascal strings had the same size overhead as C strings. One using the "byte" for length, the other for size.
528.
by knorker 3y ago
That's right. Microsoft must have used Bing to see if the name was taken, and got no results, when they named their thing LoRA.
529.
by knorker 3y ago
Hi. Cool work. For this particular record, could you confirm that this was on 868MHz?
530.
by knorker 3y ago
Not everyone at Google works on ads.
531.
by knorker 3y ago
The ACLU has changed to only defend speech they agree with. Will the EFF take over the role that ACLU had?
532.
by knorker 3y ago
Also motorcycles. How anyone can be comfortable annoying more people per hour than they'll meet in their entire life I'll never understand.
533.
by knorker 3y ago
Like I said, not all writing is for other people.
534.
by knorker 3y ago
This is not about an attention economy. It's not about not remembering your name or website. It's about there being no way to follow you. Your content needs to be maybe three orders of magnitude better, to have the slightest chanc
535.
by knorker 3y ago
It works fine, as long as you don't care if anyone reads it; Not all writing is for other people. If a blog like thing doesn't have RSS, and it's good, then I think "shame I'll never see anything this person writes
536.
by knorker 3y ago
Well, should be capped by life of the author.
537.
by knorker 3y ago
That's a completely different topic, separated by 7 years. Back to what you said: > those stories about him "being stranded" are bullshit He really really was stranded. He had no passport, and the only place he could go wi
538.
by knorker 3y ago
The US really did revoke his passport. You're saying the US government helped Snowden cover up his plans? That's some lizard people level conspiracy theory you got there.
539.
by knorker 3y ago
Don't forget the shaming of his girlfriend. They pushed hard on the narrative of her being a slutty stripper.
540.
by knorker 3y ago
So... Crime? You're describing "isn't touchable by laws". Which means crime.

More ›