4 ms·
I agree that we have no need for vengance against the criminal. But the fact that SBF would do it again is not a case for vengance/punishment, but for deterren
by knorker 3y ago
I agree that we have no need for vengance against the criminal.
But the fact that SBF would do it again is not a case for vengance/punishment, but for deterrence. And, frankly, it's harder to launch your next scam while you're currently incarcerated.
I hear you saying "I don't want vengance, but…", but there's actually no contradiction there. You want deterrence and to prevent recidivism.
And merely taking all his money, and all his parents money, is not actually a deterrence. But that doesn't mean prison is vengence/punishment for punishment's sake.