Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
knollimar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
Especially if the path is well trodden. "Make me a kanban board for construction tasks. I want you to walk me through the process of hosting it" worked for me.
92.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
do parents not control routers and cell plans? I feel like it would be easy to look here for header based solutions. They probably exist tbh. Then just ban your kid from VPNs.
93.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
I know this is a plug but I thought of it, too! I hope this is the next benchmark they saturate. I like where Karpathy is going; I had the same thoughts about LLM generated slop scenery. I just want some variety of scenery for the goblins
94.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
They can't even run a vending machine. I don't want to do a shallow dismissal, but I think there's a gulf between my understanding and yours. I hope it's me so I learn something. I think LLMs will be excellent glue of
95.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
I saw that "~free" and laughed.
96.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
it's crazy because I've seen "implement flappy bird on an FPGA with VGA output" as a 2 week project to a human as something immediately understandable. Maybe it's the smoothness of motion that makes these games unde
97.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
I don't understand why verifying isn't in the loop. If you gave an LLM: "is this statement consistent with this RAG data?" it would do well. It feels lazy that this isn't built into the harness in some adversarial
98.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
The grid doesn't give you money in these locations. They give you credits for future consumption. You can only spend this on energy. If you always have a surplus, you will just rack up large amounts of credits.
99.
▲
by
knollimar
2mo ago
they're saying you might not use the extra energy if your PV runs year round. If you continuously had a year round surplus, you wouldn't have a need to buy any energy, so the credits would be monopoly money.
100.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
How do you combat review bombing or someone just being bigoted?
101.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
They're the crackhead on the streetcorner proclaiming doom at this point.
102.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
I thought the implication of the feudal system was that the spaceships create landed nobility
103.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
That numner blends in training or no?
104.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Whats personal about a datacenter?
105.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
It's justa caveat is side to the main point. No human would say that. It's like a load bearing utility shed
106.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
the phrase load-bearing caveat makes me irate
107.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Don't complain that you lose funding if you sacrifice utility for a cirlejerk around craftsmanship. I'm sure there's a programming equivalent. I believe theyre saying don't lose sight of the trees.
108.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Pretty sure the pfizer building was vertical expansion without reinforcement. I dont think they got to the pools. I worked for a company that did a bid for the electrical work. Edit: there was a pool. Didnt have on plans at time Second e
109.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Whwre does aquarium come from?
110.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
My assertion is that LLMs tend to add info that makes them hyperfixate on errors.
111.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
>I'm either going to ask the AI how to do it LLMs seem terrible at using LLMs in harnesses. Have you seen how they rot their context with the stuff they put in .md files if you let them? You'd have to have the LLMs search, and
112.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Moonshot can prove they added value with their paper. Where's Anthropic's proof?
113.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
If not I propose HLRF.
114.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Please it's almost my primary bench for drafting understanding. I'm almost about to post that xkcd 810
115.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
I feel like that was true up until 6 months ago.
116.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Doesn't China smelt most of the world's aluminum due to inexpensive energy? I thought that was their thing
117.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Aren't they on the "we, the safe AI, must win at any cost" justifiers? What's a little contract violation if the fate of humanity is at stake?
118.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Im excited for the labs with more data RLHFing this (e.g. cursor). That model will be crazy.
119.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Meanwhile the U.S. suffers under Vernor vs Autodesk
120.
▲
by
knollimar
3mo ago
Disgusting. If you can't list a fee you have no right to charge it. I don't care what your unit cost structure is.
More ›