kn1ght

3 ms·

1.
by kn1ght 5y ago
Hey I've also worked in a previous company that was doing exactly this for DK, UK, etc. As far as I remember one of the bigger things there was tissue density and masking effects where it might become not as clear cut for a radiologist
2.
by kn1ght 5y ago
The whole protocol was designed very cleverly from the start to avoid all the privacy blocks that might inhibit people from using it [1], because the main drawback in this is that it's completely useless unless you have a critical mass
3.
by kn1ght 5y ago
I worked in a small research company that had a method (segmentation + CNNs, etc) a few years back. We had some exciting stuff also on masking effects, but as soon as we got into SaMD and the main revenue stream (grants) dried up, engineeri
4.
by kn1ght 5y ago
Thanks for the articles. I definitely don't do it the same way I process language. To use the same example- I describe a task unambiguously, which makes it a translation from written text to memory regions or execution paths. It gets m
5.
by kn1ght 5y ago
One of my Uni professors was working on Proof-carrying code *( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-carrying_code ). I got a cursory involvement. Although I agree with you, the fact that there is a way forward and is enti
6.
by kn1ght 5y ago
Programming languages are not full linguistics, at least not yet. We focus primarily on syntax, semantics and pragmatics. All of this, though, is firmly rooted in mathematics, defining grammar as expressions and mathematical relationships.