klvino

6 ms·

31.
by klvino 4y ago
Thank you for linking to all of the data. Consumers have different priorities than society when it comes to these systems, "convenience" vs "safety" respectively. If these systems are not improving safety above baseline
32.
by klvino 4y ago
With the repostings, does this hint that they're looking for additional funding/investment or attempting to further scale the business.
33.
by klvino 4y ago
Objective analysis. Cuban, Musk, and others have developed fandoms yielding coverage that portrays them as 'saints' (an overly positive light). With fandoms comes some degree of polarization as non-fans present their counter-poin
34.
by klvino 4y ago
That was my first thought as well, heavy use within an existing desert environment would likely have negative ecological impact. When reading through the article, it has potential application in areas where a local water supply may not be c
35.
by klvino 4y ago
My 90+ year old father-in-law still drives and does shortcuts in both urban and suburban environments that none of the maps programs have caught. None of his driving was remotely 'dangerous' either. Not everyone ages at the same
36.
by klvino 5y ago
Would probably include ICQ in the list for #2
37.
by klvino 5y ago
For some small freshwater lakes, they participate in "weed harvesting" to keep waterways navigable and reduce "nutrient load" to the lake which can trigger algae blooms. The "weeds" are various forms of aquati
38.
by klvino 5y ago
Agree, it brings a proper closing to the individual discourse. Regards, The Lannisters
39.
by klvino 5y ago
Guess we'll skip branding and awareness campaigns, ignore all post-view purchases, not use cross-device or cross-channel attribution, and not look at attribution of offline conversion/visitation activity. If the only thing you do
40.
by klvino 5y ago
Understand the intent behind the bill. Wouldn't the bill be closer to effectiveness if it banned corporations from selling to any government and not only the US government? By only banning the "US government" in the "p
41.
by klvino 6y ago
The Uber incident has been known for almost a year. There are other instances, mostly undisclosed audits which have shown similar results. One audit revealed $220m in ad spend for a global brand with a +$500m budget had no impact on their
42.
by klvino 6y ago
Settings > Location > Improve Accuracy 2 settings, one for Wi-Fi scanning and one for Bluetooth
43.
by klvino 6y ago
First off, not advocating a position just providing background. The interpretation of GDPR by certain companies is that when someone requests "data deletion", they are to delete the association of the data points to "known id
44.
by klvino 6y ago
Short answer, yes. The concept of "foreign governments" is very US-centric. This tracking is not a US-only concept and the connection of these data points is already being used in non-US markets by companies which cross these bo
45.
by klvino 8y ago
Question, why was a Facebook click event (fbclid) query string included in the URL for this article? Did you find the article on Facebook and forget to remove the string, which results in anyone on this site that clicks on the string to be