klntsky

24 ms·

421.
by klntsky 7y ago
Imagine the amount of bureaucratic burden these proposals would impose (even for small business, cause it is not obvious how to count users, etc.). > the private parts must be seperated This means literally making legal interpretation of
422.
by klntsky 7y ago
> Google is especially worrisome because it has maintained an unopposed monopoly on search worldwide for nearly a decade. It controls 92 percent of search, with the next largest competitor, Microsoft’s Bing, drawing only 2.5%. 1. The def
423.
by klntsky 7y ago
For reference: https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/latest/docs/html/users_gu...
424.
by klntsky 7y ago
> http://radicalmarkets.com/chapters/uniting-the-worlds-worker... > We propose a Visas between Individuals Program (VIP) that would tie together the interests of the working classes of rich and poor countries thr
425.
by klntsky 7y ago
This is too trivial to share, IMO. Anyway, shell is more suitable for this kind of programs: you could write a bash script that ties together youtube-dl and dmenu or fzf or whatever within an hour.
426.
by klntsky 7y ago
Yes, but you still need to create a code generator first. If your language of choice allows to do it nicely.
427.
by klntsky 7y ago
Imagine a person preferring one ad-driven social network to another because of more advanced digital graveyard capabilities.
428.
by klntsky 7y ago
> is, by definition, a bad idea. So what is the definition? This is certainly legal.
429.
by klntsky 7y ago
> This is a funny question because most successful open source software seems to be a clone of existing software This is just wrong. None of the examples you mention are clones.
430.
by klntsky 8y ago
> It might be painful to admit, but the practical value of that rather specialized knowledge that took me several years of hard work to obtain is pretty much zero now. It's sad that your professors didn't tell you beforehand th
431.
by klntsky 8y ago
Note: Haxe does not typecheck macros. See https://haxe.org/manual/macro-ExprOf.html For example, this seemingly ill-typed definition (which should return Int as suggested by the type paramater, but in fact returns a st
432.
by klntsky 8y ago
Haskell with TemplateHaskell is definitely worth giving a shot. You can find good examples of its use by searching for reverse dependencies of template-haskell package[0]. One of these is my tiny experiment that features program synthesis b
433.
by klntsky 8y ago
> the checks could be run-time or disabled overall, enabled just for testing If you do not require proofs, how is that different from C-like asserts and unit testing? How are refinement types related?
434.
by klntsky 8y ago
> It's exactly this attitude that has a chilling effect on all speech, no matter the subject. No, it isn't. The lack of precaution and inability to decently set up a forum software is.
435.
by klntsky 8y ago
Copyright is not a property right, but it relates to ideas the same as property right relates to real life objects: both define what one can do with the subject. IMHO, one of the reasons why the copyright has gained success is because of ex
436.
by klntsky 8y ago
Good. The more damage copyright holders do to the public, the more people understand why the idea of owning ideas is stupid.
437.
by klntsky 8y ago
Nope. These communities' owners and participants were basically just doing free work by producing content. But they didn't sign a contract or anything. > So not unreasonable to blame them when they change their mind in the name
438.
by klntsky 8y ago
/r/Piracy owners deserve it. They should've considered such a possibility before allowing their community to grow on a platform they do not control. So they are not "victims", just a bit inconsiderate. And there is
439.
by klntsky 8y ago
> How can you kick an unwanted visitor out of your house because you don't like what he's saying? This is unrelated. If it is your home, you are free to protect it by any means.
440.
by klntsky 8y ago
> but either the government just wanted to pretend it cared (back when they introduced the law), or it doesn't care and accepts that this implementation is good enough. It's all about responsibility transfer, I think. If you&#x
441.
by klntsky 8y ago
> should always use 555 numbers in tests ...And don't give your test suite access to the real world.
442.
by klntsky 8y ago
Check out these: https://github.com/tsudoko/long-live-pomf/blob/master/long-l...