klmadfejno

12 ms·

61.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
And yet, the vast majority of DCSS players choose tiles over ASCII. Liking games without nice visuals doesn't mean people don't like nice visuals.
62.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
If I want to film a dragon, I'm probably going to choose CGI because it gets me the best dragon. It is coincidentally cheaper than building a puppet, or genetically engineering a lizard to look like a dragon, but cost isn't the mo
63.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
> Good DS starts simple, ships, and then iterates. Bad DS starts with the most advanced technique they know. > Good DS is constantly learning & evolving their toolbox. Bad DS stagnates and sticks with what they know. These are the
64.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I think that's a risky assumption. It's plausible that even in no-social-distance areas, the most vulnerable people socially distanced anyway.
65.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
We would have reacted more assertively because that would have been a much bigger problem. We're lucky it was this way.
66.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
Events like this are rare, and often not handled well by humans. You have 3 basic options, and in reality some mix of all of them. 1) Hit the object 2) Swerve 3) Brake Hitting the object is almost always a bad idea. On a highway the best op
67.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
Me, just because I don't want to drive.
68.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I'm not a security expert but I find this idea to be unlikely. That someone could hack into a car, force it to drive into a guaranteed lethal accident, and successfully remove all traces, and manage to fool the telemetry analysts into
69.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
If patheticness is an important qualifier, I think breaching the capitol building suffices.
70.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
Sounds more like queuing theory than physics
71.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
There's a low upper bound on efficacy. You can only kill someone once. Realistically both methods leave evidence. To do a code exploit you need to find something, sit on it hoping its upatched, and then hope nobody can figure out that
72.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
They also do the scene where he plays video games with gesture controlled inputs but no sort of ui that demonstrates how to do them or how they're being received. An odd choice that stuck with me. I think it was a very good call to not
73.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
> Why create additional ways for state actors to kill people? State actors can destroy buildings, so I guess we shouldn't make buildings /s. Or less sarcastically, state actors can compromise laptops, so I guess we should stop
74.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
> Send goons with chemical warfare agents? Literally yes.
75.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
That button dispenses advertisements to neuralink users.
76.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I think it's charming personally.
77.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
When I opened the page I was disappointed to not see a picture of someone using confusing holographic ui's to navigate some sort of graph. Scrolling down, I see my fears were unnecessary. AI == holographic UI. The girl in Education and
78.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
Every day I hold my 1" tungsten cube, and cannot help but think... "I should have gotten a bigger cube".
79.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I read a random letter from my grandfather recently. The most interesting part of it was how much mundane life updates were in it. Things that don't seem normative to communicate in written word anymore, because they're so transie
80.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
The commander of the prisoner of war camp fed his beloved dog to the prisoners? edit: oh, no they ate the dog and were punished for it I see.
81.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
> Or - hear me out - the partner was embarrassed to verbalize that she's competing with the friend's engagement ring, and therefore created a less embarrassing, post-hoc rationalization as to why she wants a $40k ring too. Here
82.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
State actors can kill you with a variety of common household items if they so desire.
83.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
> Everyone acts hoping that they can bring more good to the world than bad. Not so sure about that one
84.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
That doesn't make any sense if there's no non-religious category
85.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
Cocaine is also a drug, and yet, one doesn't need to date someone addicted to either. > I wouldn't go that far - we all have hobbies/interests we are passionate about that we're not utilitarian about and are willing t
86.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I've gotten into the habit of looking at writers credits when a show I'm watching starts to go downhill. Inevitably its because some key person at helm started to leave.
87.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
Moissanite ring for < $1,000. Upper middle class, northeast coast american. Nobody in my social circle thinks rings are important, including SO. Observationally, younger couples who have been dating longer tend to care less about rings.
88.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
> My partner also mentioned that she'd like a wedding ring of the same calibre since according to her - diamond ring is how much love / value / worth I hold for her. I don't really understand situations where peoples&
89.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I'd say more of a generational thing
90.
by klmadfejno 5y ago
I experienced a super busy dad for some long stretches and it never felt harmful personally. Could have been mom alternatively. Probably could not have been both at the same time without feeling some consequence.

More ›