klingon79

7 ms·

1.
by klingon79 6y ago
Or people just make it look like they’ve made mistakes. Maybe this was an elaborate honeytrap set by the hackers for the hacker hackers. Possibly an AI independently hacked the hackers. A hacker may have convinced an AI to hack the hackers
2.
by klingon79 6y ago
How about Pat? That’s ambiguous enough.
3.
by klingon79 6y ago
I still don’t understand what the problem is here.” With Google doing this. We don’t know that this whole thing is not invented by the author or that they were indeed not doing anything malicious. All of this, as credible as it may seem, co
4.
by klingon79 6y ago
My point is: How do we know what the sit author is saying is accurate?
5.
by klingon79 6y ago
How would Google know that a site is curling another site? Why would they flag that as a phishing site? I’m just having a difficult time determining how this situation is not the fault of the site/app; we don’t even know that any of th
6.
by klingon79 6y ago
I’m less concerned about the footprint and more about security. It can be assumed that anything running on the desktop has or will have vulnerabilities. The rise of web applications has been partially due to the assumption of great sandboxi
7.
by klingon79 6y ago
Exchange is often externally open in some way for OWA. One that server is hacked, you may be wide-open internally. I’d be at least as concerned about an Exchange vulnerability as I would be about Outlook, but probably more.
8.
by klingon79 6y ago
> the law should be written to ban both using a phone or playing harmonica while driving without specifically mentioning either, except perhaps as examples. Slippery slope arguments shouldn’t apply to specific provisions in the law that
9.
by klingon79 6y ago
While it’s the less plausible explanation, I think this theory should be explored further. With a photo like this, what can we do to assist in proving or disproving the theory that it’s indeed flying? Also, is the headline incorrect if it i
10.
by klingon79 6y ago
And “Castles in the Sky” was about the development of radar in England.
11.
by klingon79 6y ago
Yes, we’ve had hovering craft for a while; they typically appear to be closer to the water, though.
12.
by klingon79 6y ago
It likely was- but probably the terrestrial, non-xenobiological kind.
13.
by klingon79 6y ago
I wonder if these headers were applied to the majority of C projects in, let’s say, all projects that were part of a Linux distribution- how much would fail to compile. My guess is: a lot.
14.
by klingon79 6y ago
> Is it that the possibility of being let go after a large project that you performed a relatively specialized role on feels just about right for a consultancy, but not for a business that carries themselves like a long term player? This
15.
by klingon79 6y ago
As mentioned close to the bottom of that article, another take on it was that it involved UFOs: https://losangeleno.com/strange-days/battle-of-los-angeles/
16.
by klingon79 6y ago
I was told that internally at Redhat if you’re assigned to a project and the project becomes unsupported by the company, you have a certain amount of time to be picked up by another team, after which, if you aren’t, you are let go. I know t
17.
by klingon79 6y ago
Yes, and Scrum done well can promote a sense of well-being through fulfillment of points and provides rhythmic but varying work for those that like process. Done poorly it may create a wealth of problems. The cadence may create undue sense
18.
by klingon79 6y ago
Japanese also came up with Kaizen, which Scrum should be about but isn’t, along with Kanban, the process- not the generic term for workflow that some use it as. While we’re on the topic of Agile, though, it’s best not to forget its eXtrem