klingebeil

5 ms·

1.
by klingebeil 7y ago
Calling an independent magazine "the media" is just lazy criticism. You can be of a different opinion, but that‘s not an argument.
2.
by klingebeil 8y ago
Ironic, considering Kant also wrote in his reflections > "Es ist unmöglich, dass ein Mensch ohne Religion seines Lebens froh werde." > "It‘s impossible for a human to enjoy his life without religion."
3.
by klingebeil 8y ago
News media does not operate at the scale of Netflix or Spotify, etc. Spotify has about 87 million paying users, Netflix around 150 million. The New York Times has around 4 million. That‘s a huge difference in scale alone. And the NYT is the
4.
by klingebeil 8y ago
> What I think you're seeing is that people are paying the amount they're willing to pay. When your choices are $40/mo or $0/mo for the WSJ and you average an article or two from them a week, a lot of people will opt
5.
by klingebeil 8y ago
Good for you. And the answer should be, as with everything else: the amount everybody is willing to pay. I understand your criticism, but what we‘re seeing is the fall out of the disruption of the news industry. The old model (advertising)
6.
by klingebeil 8y ago
Those pesky journalists, wanting to get payed! Not something you wrote, but HNs relationship to journalism is weird. On the one hand there‘s an infinite stream of complains about clickbait and how advertising ruined the media. On the other
7.
We all grow hooves (Niemanlab 2019 Prediction)(niemanlab.org)
1 points by klingebeil 8y ago|0 comments
8.
by klingebeil 8y ago
Foreign countries undermining the manipulating democracy is "just another way form of political campaigning". That‘s a really really cynical way of framing the problem.
9.
by klingebeil 8y ago
Maybe, just maybe because both did things that are worth scrutinizing and reporting on? Which kind of is the job of journalists?
10.
by klingebeil 8y ago
If newspapers were only interested in clicks, no one would write such a story. No journalist would spend 6 months of their time researching such a story. Would you please stop with this simplistic media meme? This is not how things work in
11.
by klingebeil 8y ago
Well here we go. That‘s not even remotely true. And even if they did, what you somehow think the did, why didn't Tesla sue for libel? You know that there‘s a huge legal risk for Reveal, which means that an army of lawyer is waterproofi
12.
by klingebeil 8y ago
There‘s a huge difference between getting something wrong in an article and "fake news". Could we please at least try to have nuanced discussions around this topic or news in general?
13.
by klingebeil 8y ago
As someone working in the media business. Please could you at least google the outlet you‘re talking about? You‘re embarrassing yourself with your own ignorance. Reveal is a non-profit. They don‘t care about page views, because they don‘t n
14.
by klingebeil 8y ago
I will never understand the reflex of decrying news as "FUD" or outlets as "MSM", if journalists don‘t write what you want to hear.
15.
Tesla and Beyond: Hidden Problems of Silicon Valley (Reveal Podcast)(revealnews.org)
2 points by klingebeil 8y ago|0 comments
16.
Manufacturing an Artificial Intelligence Revolution(papers.ssrn.com)
3 points by klingebeil 9y ago|0 comments