Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
klakier
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
klakier
8y ago
They adjusted the results for the excretion ratio (adjusted for urinary creatinine and specific gravity, respectively). Note that at least in Europe the toothpastes for children contain no fluoride.
2.
▲
by
klakier
9y ago
It's not hard to make original music. It's easy! But it's way harder to find listeners of original music. People like what they already know...
3.
▲
by
klakier
9y ago
When I see posts like "Why did we choose something over something other", I'm like "Nobody cares"
4.
▲
by
klakier
9y ago
Guys, please support Blender finiancially. This is most awesome open project, so polished!
5.
▲
Digital Ocean ssh key authentication security risk
(seclists.org)
5 points
by
klakier
10y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
What a bullshit. I'd call this Russian way of doing business, where you benefit from unhealthy connections with state. 2500 houses? Go find out how many houses are there in California.
7.
▲
American Athletes Caught Doping – WADA Hacked
(fancybear.net)
2 points
by
klakier
10y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
We should worry because of the blurred responsibility. Have you ever seen large company responsible for death? This is how it works, you will die and there will be nobody responsible for this. Tesla is not safe car, it is as safe as Honda C
9.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
What I meant here, is not that GPL was not tested in court. Just imagine situation of one of the authors saying: I no longer want to see my code on the Internet. Let's say he contributed 30% of the code. Now what? He is the author, he
10.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
It makes me happy to see this. But still I'd advise using developer agreements, if you want the control of the project. And correct license of course!
11.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
In most countries law does not `see` GPL. Law sees authorship. And in open source projects the authorship is not clear. You can be 5% author of the code. So be careful what you are doing with the code.
12.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
I suppose in most countries, one cannot sign away personal copy rights. You are always the author. But one can easily give right to use the work because of author's economic rights (and one must obligatory specify the fields of explora
13.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
These are about violation of GPL, none of the suits was filed by individual developer who was contributing to the code base. Show me better examples.
14.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
Do you know that according to copy rights, open source projects are mess. Nobody tried it in the court, but if some developer contributing to project went to court saying "This part of code is mine, I don't want it to be modified
15.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
I agree - if he wanted to fork, he should created a new website.
16.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
Try doing this - I created a full piano synth like Pianoteq working in realtime on Linux. Took me about year to complete (with breaks). You can listen to it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4I9SPCZIk4
17.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
My god...how come you could explain everything, sir. You sir must be great mind of our time. Do yo see future as well?
18.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
Thanks for great answer!
19.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
Bullshit... this is still encoding. It does not matter that it is using neural network to encode frame. Guys, when you get over this neural network hype? I can as well create and encoder using some machine learning, to create a blurry and i
20.
▲
by
klakier
10y ago
Interesting that Polish wikipedia has more information about this than English. It says that military accident was not likely.