kkjjkgjjgg

13 ms·

91.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
They don't need to replace something that doesn't even exist?
92.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Why would they want Estonia? Also, I suppose war simply has a cost, sanctions and so on can simply be factored into the calculation. It's not a Russian mindset, it is rational.
93.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Ok so it means they botched the animation of some characters?
94.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
What is "T posing"?
95.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Are other companies really better, though? I would expect all big companies to be horrible.
96.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
So far they only propose their server proxy thingie. Is it clear what data they intend to share?
97.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Why do they exist? In the hopes that eventually it could work?
98.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
So taking photographs of your children's life's events? Or what are you referring to?
99.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
This method of the server sharing data with third parties was already possible before.
100.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
"a lot of what I describe" - you mean big players collecting even more data? Not really illegal, you just have to get the users to consent somehow. Which most do anyway.
101.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
In the old days, servers could still share data with third parties, so in that sense, there never was any way to be sure.
102.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Yes, hence the issue with photographs of events of our children. I'm not convinced yet it is a net positive. For sure it increased senseless bureaucracy by a huge margin (not just the clicks on web sites, it creates more work in other
103.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Nevertheless it could be strictly better: the new version gives the OPTION to share less data, whereas the old version does not really give you the option. If you include third party scripts, they can just send the information to third part
104.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
At least they don't make you work for a company you possibly detest, like RECAPCHA forcing you to work for Google. It often boggles my mind how serious businesses do that kind of thing to their customers.
105.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Is it really worse for the users? Article also mentions possible privacy benefits, as Google could prevent transmission of some data to third parties.
106.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Did it really make the world a better place? Most sites collect as much data as ever, but now we need many more clicks, and can't have nice things like photos from kindergarden parties anymore.
107.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
"unlawful, illegal occupation" Has it been established that that is what it was? Serious question, I didn't follow the details closely enough.
108.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Why wouldn't royalities be based in "net sales"? I didn't finish reading the linked article to the end, because it is so long without much substance. Does it actually describe any of the alleged manipulation of the &quot
109.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
"one valid criticism often leveled at them is that they are catering to rich and influential people" It's not actually a valid criticism, and it is also not a problem. Anybody who worries about that is free to launch another
110.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
How does the US have power over crypto exchanges? And don't most countries have exchanges that offer local currency?
111.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
At least it can be rerouted. I don't know - I am not well versed in "protesting philosophy". The economic damage seems less serious, after all, the truckers could also just decide to not come to Canada to begin with. It is th
112.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
I don't think they can simply block the trade routes - surely people can route around it. In any case they protest against not being allowed into the country with their trucks, so either way the trucks wouldn't be running?
113.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
I think they should be strong in upholding the law, but not in bossing their citizens around.
114.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Maybe it's the difference between protesting and rioting? Did the truckers burn stuff down and loot shops?
115.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Should governments be concerned about looking "weak"?
116.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Yes we are headed to that point. Whether the public will resist at some point is the big question (or if it even still has the power to do so).
117.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
It just seems odd to then complain about "waste of energy". If you care about that sort of thing, why participate?
118.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Most Bitcoin trades don't even register on the blockchain. And not every transferal on the blockchain is an investment. What a silly methodology.
119.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
If you see no utility in it, why do you waste energy mining it?
120.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
Could be hardcoded?

More ›