kjuulh

7 ms·

61.
by kjuulh 1y ago
Something must be preventing them updating the status page at this point. Of course they could still deem it not enough, but just from my limited tests, docker, buf, etc (it may not be GCP that is down, but it is quite the coincidence). are
62.
by kjuulh 1y ago
I am by no means a C++ expert, a noob rather. It might be possible to make this generic, but it seems quite easy to forget a small detail here, and then be kneecapped because you forgot one of the overloads. So that in very few amount of ed
63.
by kjuulh 1y ago
Mainly in relation to notify/listen and advisory locks. Most of our code bases use advisory lock based migration tools. It would be a large lift moving to an alternative or building a migration scheduler out of process
64.
by kjuulh 1y ago
That is why I was hopeful for Neon unlike a lot of the other ones. Yugabyte however isn't just postgres.
65.
by kjuulh 1y ago
Congratulations to the Neon team. To be honest this is a little sad for me. I'd hoped that Neon would be able to fill the vacuum left by CockroachDB going "business source" Being bought by DataBricks makes Neon far less inter
66.
by kjuulh 2y ago
I feel the pain, I had so much trouble setting up QMK to my handwired keyboard. I had to give up on VIA and VIAL and just config my keys in text. It basically took the same amount of time 3d printing my case, soldering it (Dactyl Manuform)
67.
by kjuulh 2y ago
Exactly. When comparing dagger with a lot of the other formats for ci, it may seem more logical. Ive spent so much time debugging github actions, waiting 10 minutes for testing a full pipeline after a change etc. Over an over again. Dagger
68.
by kjuulh 2y ago
It is a perfectly valid crtitisim dagger is not a full build system that dictates what your artifacts look like. Unlike maybe something like bazel or nix. I think of dagger as a sort of interface that now allows me to test and package my
69.
by kjuulh 2y ago
I am biased because I built the rust SDK for dagger. But I think it is a real step forward for CI. Is it perfect? Nope. But it allows fixing a lot of the shortcomings the author has. Pros: - pipeline as code, write it as golang, python, typ
70.
by kjuulh 2y ago
I've been using a mix of delta and difftastic both are amazing. Difftastic especially for tree-sitter AST syntaxes, it is a bit slower, but AST aware diff is so nice. Delta looks clean, and is super fast
71.
by kjuulh 2y ago
I'd like to use ipv6, if only to avoid having to pay for an ipv4 address for some private vpcs (with public address for reasons). I remember having issues with fly.io as well, because they're ipv6 by default if I remember correctl
72.
by kjuulh 2y ago
Nickel lang is such an effort. Id say the syntax is a mix of json and lua and aims for a non-touring complete program. It is still a bit early but it looks promising
73.
by kjuulh 2y ago
I've been using both. Charm/bubbletea toolstack, is very much focused on an ELM style architecture, I.e. message passing and deriving UI from state. You can still do immediate type UI if that is what you prefer, but it won't
74.
by kjuulh 2y ago
If you want something on the more application side, I.e. utilization of low-level techniques, I can highly recommend looking into game engine development, even if you aren't interested in games per say. I've recently enjoyed Game
75.
by kjuulh 2y ago
Sadly not, it is very much tied to our workflows and as such wouldnt provide much value for anyone else other than a reference. Nevertheless I thought I'd share our approach to anonymization / pseudoanomyzation as I haven't r
76.
by kjuulh 2y ago
I just published our approach to pseudo anonymization and sort of anonymization. We'd built a tool which can traverse data extract the pii data and put back a token into the data. Before one of our allowed systems would read the data w
77.
by kjuulh 2y ago
This site seems much more like an some of the awesome-<insert tech here> repositories on github than a guide. Although it does give some extra information on the packages. To not make it took negative. I personally use Chezmoi, which
78.
by kjuulh 3y ago
The security rules where I fell off my love with Firebase, not that there is anything wrong with the security, but until the point of having to write those security rules, the product experience felt magical, so easy to use, only one app to
79.
by kjuulh 3y ago
This is simply a tool I built because I was tired of using the various git uis to navigate my, and others repos. This way I can just fuzzy search repos, and it will switch between them.
80.
GitHub Fuzzy Clone(github.com)
1 points by kjuulh 3y ago|1 comments
81.
by kjuulh 3y ago
I've previously worked on mainframes (building business software, and worked quite low level with crypto libraries on them), and now do some of the same but for "cloud" based software instead. Mainframes are such a weird subj
82.
by kjuulh 3y ago
While yes, an engineer could build a slack clone. Probably initially quite poor and lacking features. If you're not in the business of building chat applications, having to actually maintain such an application becomes a burden. While
83.
by kjuulh 3y ago
Happy new years everyone. I started regularly browsing Hacker News around the start of corona when I graduated from university as well. It has been an amazing few years, and I look forward to the coming year. A lot has changed these last ye
84.
by kjuulh 3y ago
The only good identifier is a private one. Email, usernames, etc. They should all be changeable. You don't know what laws come unto function, which events occur, does a person change gender and now need a new social security number, di
85.
by kjuulh 3y ago
What about oidc and authn+z on their own? ;) Failure galore
86.
by kjuulh 3y ago
Fully agree if you need the session. Then yeah some kind of delegation/abstraction is required. Especially for social/3rd party login. The missed I've seen is simple that oidc was used on multiple levels to facilitate a login
87.
by kjuulh 3y ago
That is probably also the best path if you choose to use oidc as a login / identity solution etc. They do give a lot of stuff out of the box, as well as making it quite easy to integrate with. But at quite the price =D From my point of
88.
by kjuulh 3y ago
It indeed isn't that hard to get something up and running with oidc or oauth. However, what becomes problematic is handling inherent complexity of whatever the provider you use is. If the OIDC flow is only intended for you or in-house
89.
by kjuulh 3y ago
It really is, in some of these flows the single sign on nature of oidc isn't even used, or hacked away. And only used for login. Which is absolutely wild.
90.
by kjuulh 3y ago
Yep, this is why I say that oidc is vastly misused. There are much better options out there for implementing good solid, login, session flows. Using oidc as the only tool in the toolbox is a recipe for disaster.

More ›