kjhkhkj

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kjhkhkj 7y ago

   The point of my comment is that violence goes both ways.
2. 2.▲
   by kjhkhkj 7y ago

   Japan, the safest country in the world has a GINI coefficient of 0.462. I don't think that's particularly good. > We should provide them the tools and resources to do so in a prosocial way. The reason why you default to this in
3. 3.▲
   by kjhkhkj 7y ago

   It always comes down to violence and that argument makes me less sympathetic not more. I'm not interested in paying off what amounts to a rabid unproductive population for some hope of safety. Also, I'm not particularly scared of
4. 4.▲
   by kjhkhkj 7y ago

   > So given how possible it is without any real downside to you I would lose money. > boils down to "i don't care about them". Exactly, I don't care about the poor. The only reason we fetishize them is because of Ch
5. 5.▲
   by kjhkhkj 7y ago

   I'm advocating for not providing it to them.
6. 6.▲
   by kjhkhkj 7y ago

   > when people have access to same things but compete for different things, for example status, choice of partners, etc. People are already complaining about inequality of status and partners. Why is inequality of wealth less just than th