kixiQu

59 ms·

661.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Let's calm down in the comments with assumptions about what people's relationships with their parents look like. E.g., some people's parents get in the way of dating, some don't. Some would be happy to see you again, som
662.
by kixiQu 6y ago
why are there so many comments assuming that the point of this project is to facilitate lighter moderation than Reddit has? the code of conduct on the site is pretty clear, actually. now, can you start a federated instance with that kind of
663.
by kixiQu 6y ago
more than you'd think! https://fediverse.network/
664.
by kixiQu 6y ago
"what kind of UX designer approved...." If you want to say that about GitHub, fair, but what an incredibly out-of-place sentiment for a FOSS project
665.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Just try something without paying for it, set some reminders to make sure you use it, don't be too prescriptive, don't do so much that it frustrates you, and only change one thing at a time about your process so you're doin
666.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Hacker News needs a "Flag As 'This Is Going To Be The Next Dropbox Comment, Isn't It'" button
667.
by kixiQu 6y ago
This is perhaps more reasonable for the community to troubleshoot, but do you know why there's no thumbnail showing up for tools like https://iframely.com/ ? Over on lemmy I'd like to post more of these but the pr
668.
by kixiQu 6y ago
I live there. This is correct in that the CHAZ itself has its biggest impacts through a. having free snacks and b. not allowing through traffic, but it really hasn't been stated enough how awful it had been when the police were ther
669.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Sort of reminds me of a one-sided webmention.
670.
by kixiQu 6y ago
I support the emergency library initiative in theory, but in practice I really wish they hadn't.
671.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Software is good at codifying processes. Part of what I have hated the most about cognitive behavioral therapy at times is what a rote process it is (even when it must be to be effective). I suspect someone will come up with something good
672.
by kixiQu 6y ago
you can still make a blog! if everyone is technically able to access your content but no one wants to (for reasons other than fearing govt. intervention), that is a very different problem than a freedom of speech problem.
673.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Even if it couldn't handle every single thing I can express in a .vimrc, if it were clearly documented what subset worked, that'd be rad.
674.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Luckily, there's a lot of that kind of content out there already.
675.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Fair enough; that artistic aspect means that for me, the design is part of the message so it's worth keeping. I think I do a similar thing with unstyled websites a la https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ ; the content has
676.
by kixiQu 6y ago
If most people agreed with you, who would be using all these platforms you've said are inferior and bad? If people didn't find the platforms met their needs better than the alternatives, why would they create and consume within th
677.
by kixiQu 6y ago
I want to suggest that all of this has more to do with you and your individual preferences than the way things work for everyone else. * what's the scale of the forums that work fine? * what if other people want to consume more content
678.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Powell's will send me an email when it's back in stock. Thanks!
679.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Yup! The cool thing about Tiddlywiki is that because it's one massive blob that executes clientside, and because it's designed to be extensible, you can yank the plugin Stroll uses right out of Stroll. If you go to https:/
680.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Yup, acked in another comment. The "k" is especially out of the norm, so with the colors as well, it's Not Ideal
681.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Any commenter with a greensward is a friend of mine! The answer is Google, sort of: https://developers.google.com/fonts/docs/getting_started#ena... The anaglyph effect is what I tweaked. It's not too unreadab
682.
by kixiQu 6y ago
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ kids these days can't handle a little 𝕵𝖗𝖆𝖐𝖙𝖚𝖗
683.
by kixiQu 6y ago
I don't think a case can be made for Wikipedia being on http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ style level. Craigslist--maybe the listing pages, sure. And that's a fair point! It has more penetration than I was allowing
684.
by kixiQu 6y ago
* random lists (e.g., things to do, books to read, movies on netflix) * personal CMS (e.g., mailing addresses, the name of so-and-so's boyfriend, etc. etc.) * bookmarked articles with quotes or summaries (e.g., I read lots of things li
685.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Yup, I've got my Tiddlywiki in a place where the portability makes me not itch to try this (sort of the opposite of local-first; a raspberry pi in the sky holds my Markdown files) but this seems like it will be something like an IDE fo
686.
by kixiQu 6y ago
It sounds like you want either something backed by a cloud drive with local installs of the software, or something more like a traditional wiki server with a markdown plugin.
687.
by kixiQu 6y ago
It's a little overblown, sure--but I do think that for the super technical power users especially, people like to invest in getting their setup tweaked just right, including all the UX details. This then creates anxiety over the risk
688.
by kixiQu 6y ago
I use Tiddlywiki 5's node server to host my wiki. I can use it on anything that can take my Yubikey :)
689.
by kixiQu 6y ago
Psst, if you end up wanting to do backlinks in context by your notes in Tiddlywiki like Roam does, as shown here... https://i.imgur.com/n9ef25L.png I have how to do that here: https://lesser.occult.institute&#x2
690.
by kixiQu 6y ago
No, because the only traction it has ever had and will ever have is with techies who are capable of recognizing (and issuing) a description of "HTML documents with only very minimal client-side JS, often without any CSS whatsoever&quot

More ›