4 ms·
No, because the only traction it has ever had and will ever have is with techies who are capable of recognizing (and issuing) a description of "HTML documents w
by kixiQu 6y ago
No, because the only traction it has ever had and will ever have is with techies who are capable of recognizing (and issuing) a description of "HTML documents with only very minimal client-side JS, often without any CSS whatsoever".
- pbourke 6y agoor, you know, Craigslist and Wikipedia.
- kixiQu 6y agoI don't think a case can be made for Wikipedia being on http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ style level. Craigslist--maybe the listing pages, sure. And that's a fair point! It has more penetration than I was allowing. But I don't think it's going to get a designy sounding name because designy sorts of people don't feel the same nostalgic affection for fairly raw HTML.