kinghajj

37 ms·

301.
by kinghajj 11y ago
Someone needs to get a death prediction market implemented. That should sway politicians' incentives pretty quickly.
302.
by kinghajj 11y ago
Maybe by the time this is ready for production, the Mill will also be!
303.
by kinghajj 11y ago
It's literally the next phrase in the sentence: > because the demographic hit by this hack is the most politically & economically powerful demographic in the world.... They're saying that because those affected have the abi
304.
by kinghajj 11y ago
First, it's a misconception that anarchists are against governance. They're against the "state," a hierarchical form of government. They didn't have difficulty organizing for defense/violence--in fact, a common
305.
by kinghajj 11y ago
The interesting part about that episode is that both the West and the USSR acted to bring them down. Authoritarians on either side were scared of the implications of a functional, libertarian socialist society.
306.
by kinghajj 11y ago
They've publicly stated that they intend to produce their own chips, though. Regarding licensing the architecture (a la ARM), Ivan said during a talk that Intel's quarterly dividend was as much as ARM's yearly revenue. So I d
307.
by kinghajj 11y ago
IMHO, the ethics are similar to the use of data obtained by German/Japanese scientists during WWII: the violation is on the persons who directly acquire the information; but, once obtained, those who receive it indirectly aren't e
308.
by kinghajj 11y ago
It just redirects to bing.com... I don't get it.
309.
by kinghajj 11y ago
...says someone who just used "we" in a too-general sense themselves!
310.
by kinghajj 11y ago
Good point, obviously the better way to mitigate is via proper firewalls so that the application servers don't access arbitrary internal hosts.
311.
by kinghajj 11y ago
The first should be allowed, but I can see why the latter are excluded. If the purpose of this validator is to run against user-submitted URLs, then you wouldn't want to allow users to specify ones to which they don't have authori
312.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> Someone tell me what use China has for "personal information" of Americans from the Office of Personnel Management. > Seriously. What do the records contain and what is it to China? Wouldn't China be more interested i
313.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> Why can't you use someone else's server under their (reasonable and clearly communicated) terms? Well, for one, clearly communicated to who, and when? Before I ever receive the first request, I cannot a priori know of any ter
314.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> No, it's entirely a violation of your ethics. Your ethics, perhaps. > express purpose of denying them income. No, the "express purpose" is to deny the creator's intent for how to interpret the markup, which has
315.
by kinghajj 11y ago
What if a TV station were concerned about people looking away during commercials, and decided to air a message stating "If you are not comfortable watching our ads, all we ask is that you please do not tune to our channel." Would
316.
by kinghajj 11y ago
So long as their HTTP server responds to requests received from me, then it is "right" for me to perform whichever operations I choose with their response. Once data is on my machine, I get to decide how to process it, not them. I
317.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> Would you still block ads on the site? Yes. Even the "non-obtrusive" ones. My computer, my browser, choice; I'm under no obligation to interpret their content as they intended.
318.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> 40+ cores per socket Uh... where? Unless you're referring to non-x86 processors, the largest Intel has released so far is 18 cores per socket.
319.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> But it's impossible to communicate directly with the United States as a self-aware entity, or to have a direct conversation with a collective. Would you expect one of your cells to be capable of carrying a conversation with you? (
320.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> pseudonymity online will be looked back on by future generations as our time's Klan hood That's an extremely bad analogy. It's reasonable to expect that anyone wearing a Klan hood has inflicted some kind of harm or pain
321.
by kinghajj 11y ago
class Planet {} class DwarfPlanet : Planet {} // ... var pluto = new DwarfPlanet(); Console.WriteLine(pluto is Planet);
322.
by kinghajj 11y ago
What's the use value of a dollar bill? To wipe one's ass? To place into a wallet to make it bulkier? No: to store for later exchange for goods and services. And so with Bitcoin. And that doesn't even get into colored coins&#x
323.
by kinghajj 11y ago
Ivan said something in the aforementioned video to the effect of "Last year, Intel's dividend was as much as ARM Holding's entire revenue."
324.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> Then congrats on never suffering verbal abuse. define: violence "behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something." It's clear that the meaning of "violence" is physica
325.
by kinghajj 11y ago
The troubling part is the equivalence between speech and violence. I fundamentally don't believe that information can be violent in any way. It can facilitate violence, surely (the plans to a nuclear bomb come to mind,) but it is never
326.
by kinghajj 11y ago
That is troubling, but I don't see how that equates to him "suppressing" anyone, if all he's done is voice his own opinions about those people. I haven't really followed the story, but was Steve part of the group th
327.
by kinghajj 11y ago
/r/conspiracy has quite a diverse set of 'characters', the anti-semitic ones are merely one of the loudest. There's also the various 9/11-truthers, the flat earthers, UFOlogers, Christian/spiritual scienti
328.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> prove the mistruths in those the declarations of intent, be it from outright liars who are participating to the useful idiots who cover the brigading scum. You've just stated exactly my point!!! Not everybody that identifies wit
329.
by kinghajj 11y ago
> Anti WTO protesters are really concerned over globalization, while Gamergaters are not concerned over journalistic integrity By what basis do you make that assertion? Can you read their minds?! This seems like a pure, basic composition
330.
by kinghajj 11y ago
The outrage wasn't only about "sexual impropriety", though certainly some who used the banner of GG were outraged by that and acted, as you rightly say, like children. However, other "sects" of the GG "movement

More ›