king_of_goats

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by king_of_goats 2y ago

   It's both, but mostly the latter. Purely from a time-management standpoint, doing the menial clerical work of compiling all the information requiring to properly respond to a dispute -- like some kind of courtroom lawyer assistant prep
2. 2.▲
   by king_of_goats 2y ago

   I see literally no benefit to challenging the disputes, assuming you don't care about getting the money back and would rather not waste the time/energy on the challenge process. The ONLY thing I might be getting wrong in my case i
3. 3.▲
   Is trying to overturn chargebacks a COMPLETE waste of time for entrepreneurs?

   5 points by king_of_goats 2y ago|5 comments
4. 4.▲
   by king_of_goats 2y ago

   I'm not saying "yeah let's rebel and keep doing it!" or anything like that; now that I'm aware of this I'll be ultra-careful going forward. My point is -- it seems absurd that people WOULD get their account ban
5. 5.▲
   by king_of_goats 2y ago

   Absolutely makes sense to have something like that, for genuine scammers, mass offenders, etc. But being but on that list for a few measly test payments to make sure your software is working properly? That to me sounds LUDICROUS.
6. 6.▲
   Making a live-mode test payment to yourself = a payment processor ToS violation?

   19 points by king_of_goats 2y ago|42 comments